Comparative Negligence in a sentence
Synonym: legal principle, liability.
Meaning: A legal doctrine that compares the negligence of both parties in an accident to determine liability.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4d13/b4d136a4860d3436fc5e0a9115f5c526df95e1fc" alt="Comparative Negligence in a sentence"
(1) The court may use comparative negligence to determine liability.
(2) Comparative negligence is a legal concept used in personal injury cases.
(3) The concept of comparative negligence is often used in car accident cases.
(4) Comparative negligence can be a difficult concept for juries to understand.
(5) The concept of comparative negligence is often used in slip and fall cases.
(6) The concept of comparative negligence is often used in medical malpractice cases.
(7) The application of comparative negligence varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
(8) Comparative negligence can be a defense used by defendants in personal injury cases.
(9) The doctrine of comparative negligence aims to ensure fairness in assigning liability.
(10) The principle of comparative negligence is used in many jurisdictions around the world.
Comparative Negligence sentence
(11) Comparative negligence can be a difficult issue to resolve in mediation or arbitration.
(12) The court ruled in favor of the defendant due to the plaintiff's comparative negligence.
(13) Comparative negligence can be a factor in determining liability in a personal injury case.
(14) The doctrine of comparative negligence is used in many different countries around the world.
(15) The plaintiff's lawyer used the principle of comparative negligence to help prove liability.
(16) Comparative negligence can be a defense used by insurance companies in personal injury cases.
(17) Comparative negligence can be a factor in determining the outcome of a personal injury trial.
(18) Comparative negligence can be a factor in determining the outcome of a personal injury lawsuit.
(19) The concept of comparative negligence is used in many different types of personal injury cases.
(20) Comparative negligence can be a defense strategy used by defendants to minimize their liability.
Comparative Negligence make sentence
(21) The concept of comparative negligence is rooted in the principle of fairness and proportionality.
(22) Comparative negligence is a legal principle used in determining liability in personal injury cases.
(23) Comparative negligence recognizes that more than one party can contribute to an accident or injury.
(24) Comparative negligence can be a complex issue that requires the expertise of experienced attorneys.
(25) Although comparative negligence is a legal concept, it is often misunderstood by the general public.
(26) Comparative negligence can be a factor in determining the percentage of fault assigned to each party.
(27) Comparative negligence can be a defense strategy used by defendants to shift blame onto the plaintiff.
(28) In a comparative negligence system, damages are apportioned based on the degree of fault of each party.
(29) The doctrine of comparative negligence is used to determine fault in many different types of accidents.
(30) The principle of comparative negligence is based on the idea that both parties may be at fault to some degree.
Sentence of comparative negligence
(31) Comparative negligence can be a complex legal concept that requires careful analysis of the facts and evidence.
(32) The concept of comparative negligence is designed to promote shared responsibility and prevent unfair outcomes.
(33) The principle of comparative negligence is intended to ensure that each party is held accountable for their actions.
(34) The plaintiff's comparative negligence was a result of the defendant's failure to properly maintain their equipment.
(35) The determination of comparative negligence often involves the examination of witness testimonies and expert opinions.
(36) The application of comparative negligence requires a thorough understanding of the relevant laws and legal precedents.
(37) The principle of comparative negligence allows for a more equitable distribution of liability in personal injury cases.
(38) The principle of comparative negligence is designed to ensure that both parties are held accountable for their actions.
(39) The concept of comparative negligence is based on the idea that individuals should be responsible for their own actions.
(40) The court found that the plaintiff's comparative negligence was negligible compared to the defendant's gross negligence.
Comparative Negligence meaningful sentence
(41) The court found that both parties were at fault due to comparative negligence, and therefore awarded damages accordingly.
(42) The concept of comparative negligence allows for the allocation of fault between multiple parties involved in an accident.
(43) The plaintiff's comparative negligence was a result of the defendant's failure to provide adequate training and supervision.
(44) The application of comparative negligence requires a careful analysis of the circumstances surrounding an accident or injury.
(45) Comparative negligence is an important legal principle that helps ensure a fair and just resolution in personal injury cases.
(46) The principle of comparative negligence is designed to ensure that both parties are treated fairly in a personal injury case.
(47) The principle of comparative negligence is based on the idea that each party should bear responsibility for their own actions.
(48) The plaintiff's comparative negligence was a mitigating factor in the case, but did not absolve the defendant of responsibility.
(49) The judge instructed the jury to consider both the plaintiff's and defendant's comparative negligence when determining liability.
(50) The defendant's insurance company argued that the plaintiff's comparative negligence should reduce the amount of damages awarded.
Comparative Negligence sentence examples
(51) Comparative negligence can result in a plaintiff receiving a reduced amount of compensation if they are found to be partially at fault.
(52) The plaintiff's comparative negligence was a contributing factor in the accident, but the defendant's reckless behavior was the main cause.
(53) The defendant's lawyer attempted to shift the blame onto the plaintiff's comparative negligence, but was unsuccessful in convincing the jury.
(54) The plaintiff's lawyer argued that the defendant's actions were the primary cause of the accident, despite the plaintiff's comparative negligence.
(55) Comparative negligence can result in a plaintiff receiving a reduced amount of compensation if they are found to have contributed to their own injuries.
(56) The court determined that the plaintiff's comparative negligence was not a significant factor in the accident, and therefore the defendant was held liable.
(57) The defendant's lawyer argued that the plaintiff's comparative negligence was the sole cause of the accident, and therefore the defendant should not be held liable.
Comparative Negligence meaning
Comparative negligence is a legal term that refers to the concept of assigning fault or responsibility for an accident or injury between two or more parties. In cases of comparative negligence, the court will determine the degree of fault of each party involved and assign a percentage of responsibility accordingly. If you are writing a legal document or discussing a case involving comparative negligence, it is important to use the term correctly and in the appropriate context. Here are some tips for using the term comparative negligence in a sentence:
1. Define the term: Before using the term comparative negligence in a sentence, it is important to define it for your audience. This will help ensure that everyone understands the meaning of the term and how it applies to the situation at hand.
2. Use the term in a legal context: Comparative negligence is a legal term, so it should be used in a legal context. This means that it should be used in discussions or documents related to legal cases or disputes.
3. Be clear and concise: When using the term comparative negligence in a sentence, it is important to be clear and concise. Use simple language and avoid using jargon or technical terms that may be confusing to your audience.
4. Provide examples: To help illustrate the concept of comparative negligence, it can be helpful to provide examples of how it has been applied in past cases. This can help your audience understand how the term works in practice.
5. Use the term consistently: When using the term comparative negligence, it is important to use it consistently throughout your document or discussion. This will help ensure that your audience understands the concept and how it applies to the situation at hand.
Overall, using the term comparative negligence in a sentence requires a clear understanding of the concept and how it applies to the situation at hand. By following these tips, you can use the term effectively and accurately in your legal discussions and documents.
The word usage examples above have been gathered from various sources to reflect current and historical usage of the word Comparative Negligence. They do not represent the opinions of TranslateEN.com.