Concurring Opinion in a sentence
Antonym: dissenting opinion
Meaning: An opinion that agrees with the majority decision in a legal case but for different reasons.
(1) The concurring opinion of the judge was well-reasoned.
(2) The concurring opinion of the lower court was overruled.
(3) The judge wrote a concurring opinion in the landmark case.
(4) The concurring opinion of the majority judge was expected.
(5) The judges issued a concurring opinion in the landmark case.
(6) The judge's concurring opinion added weight to the decision.
(7) The concurring opinion of the appellate court was unanimous.
(8) The concurring opinion of the dissenting judge was surprising.
(9) The concurring opinion of the Supreme Court was groundbreaking.
(10) The concurring opinion of the majority justice was influential.
Concurring Opinion sentence
(11) The concurring opinion challenged the prevailing legal doctrine.
(12) The concurring opinion of the dissenting justice was persuasive.
(13) The concurring opinion questioned the credibility of a key witness.
(14) The concurring opinion highlighted the need for judicial restraint.
(15) The concurring opinion criticized the majority's reliance on precedent.
(16) The concurring opinion cautioned against overreliance on legal precedent.
(17) The concurring opinion added a unique perspective to the legal discussion.
(18) The concurring opinion argued for a more nuanced understanding of the law.
(19) The concurring opinion emphasized the importance of judicial independence.
(20) The concurring opinion highlighted the flaws in the prosecution's argument.
Concurring Opinion make sentence
(21) The concurring opinion urged caution in applying the ruling to future cases.
(22) The appellate judge's concurring opinion added important insights to the case.
(23) The concurring opinion shed light on the historical context of the legal issue.
(24) The concurring opinion called for a reconsideration of existing legal standards.
(25) The concurring opinion supported the majority decision but for different reasons.
(26) The concurring opinion explored the ethical implications of the court's decision.
(27) The concurring opinion offered a dissenting view on a specific aspect of the case.
(28) The concurring opinion suggested alternative remedies for the legal issue at hand.
(29) The concurring opinion analyzed the legislative intent behind the law in question.
(30) The concurring opinion examined the practical implications of the court's decision.
Sentence of concurring opinion
(31) The concurring opinion of the judge was a crucial factor in the outcome of the case.
(32) The concurring opinion examined the impact of the decision on marginalized communities.
(33) The concurring opinion proposed a new approach to resolving similar cases in the future.
(34) The concurring opinion argued for a more balanced approach to resolving similar disputes.
(35) The concurring opinion expressed concern about the potential consequences of the decision.
(36) The concurring opinion proposed a compromise between the majority and dissenting opinions.
(37) The concurring opinion called for a reconsideration of the legal standard used in the case.
(38) The concurring opinion discussed the potential ramifications of the ruling on public policy.
(39) The concurring opinion provided a compelling argument for a different interpretation of the law.
Concurring Opinion meaning
Concurring opinion is a legal term that refers to a written statement by a judge or justice who agrees with the majority opinion in a case, but for different reasons. In other words, a concurring opinion is a separate opinion that agrees with the outcome of a case, but offers a different rationale or legal reasoning for that outcome. If you are writing a legal document or discussing a court case, it is important to understand how to use the term "concurring opinion" correctly. Here are some tips for using this term in a sentence:
1. Use the term "concurring opinion" when referring to a written statement by a judge or justice who agrees with the majority opinion in a case, but for different reasons.
For example, "Justice Smith wrote a concurring opinion in the case, agreeing with the majority but offering a different legal rationale."
2. Be sure to distinguish between a concurring opinion and a dissenting opinion. A dissenting opinion is a written statement by a judge or justice who disagrees with the majority opinion in a case.
For example, "Justice Jones wrote a dissenting opinion in the case, arguing that the majority's decision was incorrect."
3. Use the term "concurring opinion" when discussing the legal significance of a case. A concurring opinion can be important because it may offer a different legal rationale that could be used in future cases.
For example, "The concurring opinion in this case could be influential in future cases involving similar legal issues."
4. When citing a concurring opinion in a legal document, be sure to include the name of the judge or justice who wrote the opinion, the name of the case, and the citation for the opinion.
For example, "In Smith v. Jones, Justice Smith wrote a concurring opinion, 123 U.S. 456 (2010)."
5. Use the term "concurring opinion" when discussing the role of judges in the legal system. Concurring opinions demonstrate that judges are not simply rubber stamps for the majority opinion, but are independent thinkers who may have different legal reasoning.
For example, "Concurring opinions are an important part of the legal system because they show that judges are not afraid to express their own legal views."
In conclusion, understanding how to use the term "concurring opinion" correctly is important for anyone who is writing or discussing legal issues. By following these tips, you can use this term effectively and accurately in your writing and conversations about the law.
The word usage examples above have been gathered from various sources to reflect current and historical usage of the word Concurring Opinion. They do not represent the opinions of TranslateEN.com.