Defense Attorney in a sentence
Synonym: defense lawyer, counsel. Antonym: prosecutor
Meaning: A lawyer who represents a defendant in a legal case.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eff06/eff063f7a13daf6bcb9eaf8a13ec66268def0724" alt="Defense Attorney in a sentence"
(1) Atty. Ortiz is a criminal defense attorney.
(2) The defense attorney called for a mistrial.
(3) The detainee's family hired a defense attorney.
(4) The prosecutor argued with the defense attorney.
(5) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness.
(6) The defense attorney objected to the darraignment.
(7) The defense attorney will interrogate the witness.
(8) The defense attorney argued against the indictment.
(9) The defense attorney plans to dispute the sentence.
(10) The defense attorney will appellor for an acquittal.
Defense Attorney sentence
(11) The defense attorney will argue against prosecution.
(12) The defense attorney questioned the jurors' motives.
(13) The defense attorney called the witness to the stand.
(14) The crimer's defense attorney argued for a plea deal.
(15) The defense attorney was thrilled with the acquittal.
(16) The defense attorney filed a motion for habeas corpus.
(17) The judge repudiated the defense attorney's objection.
(18) The judge appoints a defense attorney for the accused.
(19) The defense attorney appealed the conviction of guilt.
(20) The defense attorney's counterpleading was convincing.
Defense Attorney make sentence
(21) The suspect's defense attorney argued for a plea deal.
(22) The witness will be questioned by the defense attorney.
(23) The depositions were requested by the defense attorney.
(24) The judge turned down the defense attorney's objection.
(25) The defense attorney successfully assoils their client.
(26) The witnessers were questioned by the defense attorney.
(27) The defense attorney will argue against the indictment.
(28) The witness was cross-examined by the defense attorney.
(29) The defense attorney cross-examined the hostile witness.
(30) The pretrial motions were filed by the defense attorney.
Sentence of defense attorney
(31) The defense attorney will dispute the parole conditions.
(32) The defense attorney decided not to strike an objection.
(33) The defense attorney will depose during the questioning.
(34) The defense attorney struggled to prevail with evidence.
(35) The accusant was cross-examined by the defense attorney.
(36) The defense attorney used counterpleading as a strategy.
(37) The defense attorney objected to the witness's deponing.
(38) The defense attorney will try to prevent the indictment.
(39) The defense attorney challenged the witness's testimony.
(40) The litigant was cross-examined by the defense attorney.
Defense Attorney meaningful sentence
(41) The defense attorney argued that the search was illegal.
(42) The defense attorney filed a motion to dismiss the case.
(43) The defense attorney is preparing to dispute the parole.
(44) The defense attorney accused the hostile witness of bias.
(45) The defense attorney filed an appeal following the trial.
(46) The accusers were cross-examined by the defense attorney.
(47) The defense attorney's objection was struck by the judge.
(48) The defense attorney avow near the witness's credibility.
(49) The defense attorney impeaches the plaintiff's character.
(50) The defense attorney accused the prosecution of barretry.
Defense Attorney sentence examples
(51) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness in-court.
(52) The defense attorney argued that the warrant was invalid.
(53) The defense attorney argued that his client was innocent.
(54) The defense attorney cross-examines the witness in court.
(55) The defense attorney is preparing to dispute the verdict.
(56) The defense attorney challenged the prosecutorial tactics.
(57) The defense attorney questioned the prosecutorial motives.
(58) The defense attorney presented evidence to the petit jury.
(59) The court ruling refuted the defense attorney's arguments.
(60) The defense attorney objected to the use of ipso evidence.
Sentence with defense attorney
(61) The co-defendant's defense attorney argued for a mistrial.
(62) The judge seemed predisposed against the defense attorney.
(63) The defense attorney will appellor for a lighter sentence.
(64) The accusants were cross-examined by the defense attorney.
(65) The accused was represented by a skilled defense attorney.
(66) The defense attorney requested a delay in the arraignment.
(67) The cross-examination by the defense attorney was intense.
(68) The interlocutory appeal was filed by the defense attorney.
(69) The defense attorney is preparing their case for the trial.
(70) The defense attorney tried to prove that he was not guilty.
Use defense attorney in a sentence
(71) The felon's defense attorney argued for a reduced sentence.
(72) The adjuror asked the defense attorney to provide an alibi.
(73) The defense attorney questioned the juryman's impartiality.
(74) The defense attorney arraigned the client behind the table.
(75) The witness's alibi was challenged by the defense attorney.
(76) The defense attorney negotiated a plea deal for his client.
(77) The defense attorney argued that his client was inculpable.
(78) The defense attorney argued against the bind over decision.
(79) The defense attorney accused the prosecutorial team of bias.
(80) The rapist's defense attorney argued for a lighter sentence.
Sentence using defense attorney
(81) The defense attorney argued over the jury selection process.
(82) The defense attorney submitted the legal brief to the court.
(83) The defense attorney accused the hostile witness of perjury.
(84) The juiz allowed the defense attorney to present their case.
(85) The killers' defense attorney argued for a reduced sentence.
(86) The defense attorney plans to dispute the verdict on appeal.
(87) The jury was unpersuaded by the defense attorney's argument.
(88) The judge scapegoated the defense attorney for the mistrial.
(89) The defense attorney filed a motion to quash the indictment.
(90) The defense attorney argued that the charges were pleadable.
Defense Attorney example sentence
(91) The defense attorney cross-examined the trialist vigorously.
(92) The defense attorney will argue their case during the trial.
(93) The defense attorney argued for the acquittal of his client.
(94) The defense attorney argued that the confession was coerced.
(95) The defense attorney argued that the witness was unreliable.
(96) The defense attorney argued against the prosecutorial claims.
(97) The defense attorney averred that the witness was unreliable.
(98) The defense attorney will allege that his client is innocent.
(99) The defense attorney is preparing for the arraigning hearing.
(100) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the accusals.
Sentence with word defense attorney
(101) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness on the stand.
(102) The judge redargued the defense attorney's argument in court.
(103) The defense attorney objected to the use of aliunde evidence.
(104) The defense attorney argued against the remand of his client.
(105) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the evidence.
(106) The warrant was challenged by the suspect's defense attorney.
(107) The prosecutor cross-examined the defense attorney's witness.
(108) The coroner's findings were disputed by the defense attorney.
(109) The defense attorney tried to judge out any prejudiced jurors.
(110) The abductor's defense attorney argued for a lenient sentence.
Sentence of defense attorney
(111) The offender's defense attorney argued for a lenient sentence.
(112) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness who testified.
(113) The jury was unresponsive to the defense attorney's arguments.
(114) The defense attorney argued against the charge of grand theft.
(115) The judge allowed the defense attorney to strike an objection.
(116) The jury is out of sync with the defense attorney's arguments.
(117) The jury is over for the defense attorney's cross-examination.
(118) The prevaricating witness was grilled by the defense attorney.
(119) The expert witness will be questioned by the defense attorney.
(120) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the averments.
Defense Attorney used in a sentence
(121) The judge dismissed objections raised by the defense attorney.
(122) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the subpoenas.
(123) The defense attorney requested copies of the issued subpoenas.
(124) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness, arrest aside.
(125) The defense attorney questioned the adjurors during voir dire.
(126) The defense attorney requested a delay in empaneling the jury.
(127) The defense attorney argues successfully and the jury acquits.
(128) The defense attorney cross-examined the prosecution's witness.
(129) The defense attorney filed an appeal against the remand order.
(130) The judge allowed the defense attorney to argue the case first.
Defense Attorney sentence in English
(131) The defense attorney will dispute the probation order in court.
(132) The accused's defense attorney fought hard to prevent damnatio.
(133) The trial order was delivered to the defense attorney's office.
(134) The judge vetoed the defense attorney's request for a mistrial.
(135) The witness's testimony was suppressed by the defense attorney.
(136) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the indictment.
(137) The embezzler's defense attorney argued for a lighter sentence.
(138) The defense attorney presented evidence to dispute the verdict.
(139) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness with precision.
(140) The witness's testimony was challenged by the defense attorney.
(141) The judge was acquiescing to the defense attorney's objections.
(142) The judge was critical towards the defense attorney's argument.
(143) The defense attorney argued against the scope of the subpoenas.
(144) The defense attorney filed a motion to suppress the confession.
(145) The recusation of the defense attorney was denied by the court.
(146) The judge grudgingly nodded to the defense attorney's argument.
(147) The affiant's statement was challenged by the defense attorney.
(148) The defense attorney's counterpleas were based on new evidence.
(149) The defense attorney is preparing to bring their case to trial.
(150) The defense attorney was pleased when his client was acquitted.
(151) The defense attorney requested a change of venue for the trial.
(152) The defense attorney argued that the entire case was a frameup.
(153) The defense attorney cross-examined the prosecutorial witnesses.
(154) The defense attorney fought for a fair hearing for their client.
(155) The malefactor's defense attorney argued for a lighter sentence.
(156) The defense attorney reviewed the charge sheet before the trial.
(157) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the indictments.
(158) The defense attorney prepared their case before the arraignment.
(159) The defense attorney argued for a mistrial due to the hung jury.
(160) The defense attorney's objection was struck by the higher court.
(161) The defense attorney tried to discredit the inculpating witness.
(162) The defense attorney argued that the averment was a fabrication.
(163) The defense attorney called the defendant's mother to the stand.
(164) The molester's defense attorney argued that he was mentally ill.
(165) The defense attorney was able to acquit his client of the crime.
(166) The jury dismissed the theory presented by the defense attorney.
(167) The defense attorney argued that his client should be acquitted.
(168) The defense attorney tried to discredit the witness's testimony.
(169) The participant in the mock trial acted as the defense attorney.
(170) The lawyer advised his client to retain a good defense attorney.
(171) The defense attorney questioned the jury into their impartiality.
(172) The defense attorney negotiated a cop a plea deal for his client.
(173) The defense attorney questioned the validity of the arrest aside.
(174) The defense attorney was held in contempt for coaching a witness.
(175) The judge overruled the objection raised by the defense attorney.
(176) The incriminating evidence was presented to the defense attorney.
(177) The informant's testimony was challenged by the defense attorney.
(178) The judge acceded to the defense attorney's request for a recess.
(179) The defense attorney requested a continuance for the arraignment.
(180) The defense attorney argued for a nol pros based on new evidence.
(181) The judge allowed the defense attorney to depose the key witness.
(182) The defense attorney objected to electing the client in absentia.
(183) The defense attorney will decry the charge as a false accusation.
(184) The witness was nervous to be questioned by the defense attorney.
(185) The perjuring witness was cross-examined by the defense attorney.
(186) The defense attorney called the defendant's sibling to the stand.
(187) The defense attorney tried to alleviate his client's bloodguilts.
(188) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the presentments.
(189) The defendant refused to cooperate with his own defense attorney.
(190) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the inculpations.
(191) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness during the trial.
(192) The defense attorney argued that the evidence was circumstantial.
(193) The accused's defense attorney questioned the condemnor's motives.
(194) The accused's defense attorney will dispute the penalty as unjust.
(195) The defense attorney questioned the memory of the hostile witness.
(196) The judge vetoed the defense attorney's objection to the evidence.
(197) The defense attorney argued that there was no evidence of perjury.
(198) The defense attorney accused the prosecution's witness of perjury.
(199) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the ipso evidence.
(200) The defense attorney argued that the witness had perjured himself.
(201) The defense attorney successfully argued for a not guilty verdict.
(202) The recusation of the judge was requested by the defense attorney.
(203) The defense attorney called the defendant's neighbor to the stand.
(204) The defense attorney called the defendant's landlord to the stand.
(205) The raper's defense attorney argued that the victim had consented.
(206) The defense attorney claimed that there was no proof of abetments.
(207) The judge accedes to the defense attorney's motion for a mistrial.
(208) The defense attorney objected to the impaneling of a biased juror.
(209) The defense attorney tried to discredit the incriminatory witness.
(210) The defense attorney objected to the witness's testimony in court.
(211) The judge allowed the defense attorney to indict inside the trial.
(212) The defense attorney was able to acquit his client of the charges.
(213) The defense attorney was pleased with the acquittal of his client.
(214) The defense attorney will cross-examine the witness who testifies.
(215) The defense attorney was able to acquit his client of all charges.
(216) The defense attorney advocated for a fair hearing for their client.
(217) The defense attorney filed a motion to suppress the issued warrant.
(218) The judge overruled the defense attorney's objection as irrelevant.
(219) The defense attorney questioned the motives of the hostile witness.
(220) The judge disaffirmed the objection raised by the defense attorney.
(221) The informant's reliability was questioned by the defense attorney.
(222) The judge vetoed the defense attorney's motion to dismiss the case.
(223) The accusable defendant's defense attorney presented a strong case.
(224) The defense attorney requested a copy of the original charge sheet.
(225) The defense attorney cross-examined the witnesses during the trial.
(226) The defense attorney requested to remand the trial to a later date.
(227) Undeceiving the jury was essential for the defense attorney's case.
(228) The defendant's defense attorney put up a strong argument in court.
(229) The defense attorney accused the prosecutorial team of racial bias.
(230) The defense attorney decided to challenge jurisdiction in the case.
(231) The defense attorney called the defendant's therapist to the stand.
(232) The defense attorney called the defendant's co-worker to the stand.
(233) The defense attorney tried to prove his client was not bloodguilty.
(234) The defense attorney requested a list of all arrestees in the case.
(235) The defense attorney tried to discredit the witness while deponing.
(236) The justness of the verdict was questioned by the defense attorney.
(237) The defense attorney objected to the impaneling of a certain juror.
(238) The defense attorney objected to the impanelling of certain jurors.
(239) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness in the witness-box.
(240) The jury felt manipulated by the defense attorney's emotional plea.
(241) The defense attorney will arraign the client on charges of perjury.
(242) The defense attorney tried to indict beside the prosecution's case.
(243) The defense attorney was confident that he could acquit his client.
(244) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness to weaken the case.
(245) The defense attorney will argue the case for his client's innocence.
(246) The jury rolled over for the defense attorney's convincing argument.
(247) The defense attorney challenged the admissibility of the confession.
(248) The defense attorney accused the prosecution's witness of perjuring.
(249) The defense attorney questioned the credibility of the eyewitnesses.
(250) The defense attorney will dispute the evidence against their client.
(251) The judge subpoenaed the defense attorney to explain their strategy.
(252) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness during the hearings.
(253) The defense attorney argued for a lenient sentencing for his client.
(254) The postponement of the trial was requested by the defense attorney.
(255) The defense attorney is working hard to overturn the guilty verdict.
(256) The arraigned suspect's defense attorney cross-examined the witness.
(257) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness's written testimony.
(258) The defense attorney argued against prosecuting behind closed doors.
(259) The defense attorney argued passionately for his client's innocence.
(260) The hearing was adjourned amid objections from the defense attorney.
(261) The defense attorney argued that the defendant's alibi was credible.
(262) The defense attorney argued against electing the client in absentia.
(263) The judge was accused of being in cahoots with the defense attorney.
(264) The defense attorney successfully argued for his acquittal of guilt.
(265) The defense attorney tried to cast doubt on his conviction of guilt.
(266) The judge acquiesced to the defense attorney's request for a recess.
(267) The defense attorney fought hard to prevent a conviction of assault.
(268) The defense attorney allegered that the prosecution's case was weak.
(269) The adjuror asked the defense attorney to cross-examine the witness.
(270) The credibility of the witness was oppugned by the defense attorney.
(271) The defense attorney will prosecute in favor of his client's rights.
(272) The defense attorney argued against the inculpation of their client.
(273) The judge struck through the objection made by the defense attorney.
(274) The defense attorney requested a continuance during the arraignment.
(275) The judge allowed the defense attorney to cross-examine the witness.
(276) The defense attorney will cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses.
(277) The prosecutor and defense attorney have different roles in a trial.
(278) The defendant's defense attorney filed a motion to dismiss the case.
(279) The witness's testimony contradicts the defense attorney's argument.
(280) The judge's impartiality was under scrutiny by the defense attorney.
(281) The defense attorney argued against the assault and battery charges.
(282) The defense attorney's argument was aimed at exculpating his client.
(283) The defense attorney struggled to build a case with limited evidence.
(284) The defense attorney argued that the prosecutorial case lacked merit.
(285) The defense attorney attempted to discredit the witness on the stand.
(286) The defense attorney argued that the hearsay evidence was unreliable.
(287) The defense attorney called expert witnesses during the day in court.
(288) The judge disaffirmed the defense attorney's objection as irrelevant.
(289) The defense attorney sought to subpoena out the expert in ballistics.
(290) The defense attorney challenged the credibility of the oral evidence.
(291) The defense attorney argued for the defendant's right to stand trial.
(292) The defense attorney successfully argued for a nol pros in the trial.
(293) The defendants' defense attorney presented a strong closing argument.
(294) The defense attorney prepared the defendant to plead guilty in court.
(295) The prosecutor will notify the defense attorney of the investigation.
(296) The defense attorney filed a motion to dispute the parole conditions.
(297) The witness's testimony contradicts the defense attorney's arguments.
(298) The defense attorney is challenging the legality of the prosecutions.
(299) The defense attorney argued that the defendant's alibi was plausible.
(300) The judge made decisions over the objections of the defense attorney.
(301) The defense attorney argued that the averments were mere speculation.
(302) The defense attorney challenged the averment made by the prosecution.
(303) The witness chose to refuse representation from the defense attorney.
(304) The defense attorney tried to delay the arraignment upon the witness.
(305) The defense attorney called the defendant's best friend to the stand.
(306) The defense attorney attempted to nullify the prosecution's evidence.
(307) The defense attorney challenged the validity of the aliunde evidence.
(308) The defense attorney objected to the composition of the venire panel.
(309) The defense attorney was able to indict inside the cross-examination.
(310) The defense attorney made a closing argument at the end of the trial.
(311) The defendant's defense attorney made a closing argument to the jury.
(312) The defense attorney had a strong opening statement to argue the case.
(313) The defense attorney objected to the introduction of hearsay evidence.
(314) The defense attorney questioned the validity of the physical evidence.
(315) The evidence was manipulated by the defense attorney to sway the jury.
(316) The judge acquiesced to the defense attorney's request for a mistrial.
(317) The defense attorney requested to remand the evidence for DNA testing.
(318) The defense attorney's strategy successfully led to an acquit verdict.
(319) The expert witness's testimony was challenged by the defense attorney.
(320) The false witness's testimony was discredited by the defense attorney.
(321) The defense attorney objected to the impaneling of a particular juror.
(322) The defense attorney called expert witnesses to reject the accusation.
(323) The defense attorney presented an alibi witness to support their case.
(324) The defense attorney strongly opposed electing the client in absentia.
(325) The defense attorney objected to the empaneling of a particular juror.
(326) The defense attorney argued for the presumption of innocence of fraud.
(327) The defense attorney's tactics were intended to distort the testimony.
(328) The adjuror asked the defense attorney to provide character witnesses.
(329) The defense attorney plans to call upon the expert witness to testify.
(330) The defense attorney objected to the way the judge empaneled the jury.
(331) The judge's ruling overtrumped the objections of the defense attorney.
(332) The defense attorney challenged the witness's testimony given on oath.
(333) The defense attorney asked to arraign till the evidence was presented.
(334) The defense attorney argued for an acquittal, citing lack of evidence.
(335) The jury had to reject the evidence presented by the defense attorney.
(336) The defense attorney objected to the admissibility of the DNA evidence.
(337) The defense attorney argued that the death was not due to asphyxiation.
(338) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness who testified in court.
(339) The courtroom was blustering with objections from the defense attorney.
(340) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness about the charge sheet.
(341) The defense attorney argued that the oral evidence was tainted by bias.
(342) The defense attorney requested to remand the case to a different judge.
(343) The defense attorney argued that the assault and battery was justified.
(344) The defense attorney will dispute the parolee's eligibility for parole.
(345) The confounding evidence presented a challenge to the defense attorney.
(346) The defense attorney presented multiple witnesses to support the alibi.
(347) The defense attorney objected to the witness being called to the stand.
(348) The judge acceded to the defense attorney's motion to dismiss the case.
(349) The recusation of the defense attorney was seen as a tactical maneuver.
(350) The unresponsive reaction from the jury surprised the defense attorney.
(351) The judge promptly dismissed objections raised by the defense attorney.
(352) The defense attorney argued that the averment was based on speculation.
(353) The defense attorney decided to file a motion to suppress the evidence.
(354) The defense attorney will try to disprove liability in a criminal case.
(355) The defense attorney worked hard to secure an acquittal for his client.
(356) The defense attorney's argument was strong enough to acquit his client.
(357) The counterpart of the prosecutor in the court is the defense attorney.
(358) The bludgeoner's defense attorney argued that he was mentally unstable.
(359) The judge allowed the defense attorney to arraign throughout the trial.
(360) The defense attorney objected to the empanelling of a particular juror.
(361) The argumenta made by the defense attorney were powerful and effective.
(362) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness who had depone earlier.
(363) The defense attorney received a subpoena beside his client's case file.
(364) The defense attorney made a convincing case for his client's innocence.
(365) The defense attorney argued passionately, but the cased was still lost.
(366) The defense attorney argued that there was no evidence of aforethought.
(367) The defense attorney argued that the indictments were based on hearsay.
(368) The defense attorney will arraign the client on charges of tax evasion.
(369) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness on the stand for hours.
(370) The defense attorney had to subpoena up the police report for the case.
(371) The defense attorney challenged the reliability of the witness's memory.
(372) The defense attorney tried to judge out any evidence obtained illegally.
(373) The defense attorney requested a pretrial conference to review evidence.
(374) The defense attorney questioned each juror during the selection process.
(375) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness during the day in court.
(376) The suspect on trial was represented by a high-profile defense attorney.
(377) The defense attorney questioned the jurors during the selection process.
(378) The defense attorney's cross-examination highlighted the witness's bias.
(379) The defense attorney presented mitigating factors during the sentencing.
(380) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness about the ipso evidence.
(381) The defense attorney successfully argued for his client to be acquitted.
(382) The defense attorney questioned the validity of the ballistics analysis.
(383) The defense attorney objected to the compellable nature of the evidence.
(384) The defense attorney objected to the line of questioning from the stand.
(385) The inmate's release from prison was a victory for his defense attorney.
(386) The judge waived through the evidence presented by the defense attorney.
(387) The jury responded unfavorably to the defense attorney's weak arguments.
(388) The defense attorney requested an adjournment to review new information.
(389) The defense attorney's cross-examination aimed to distort the testimony.
(390) The defense attorney filed a motion to suppress the witness's testimony.
(391) The defense attorney requested a nolle prosequi due to lack of evidence.
(392) The defense attorney argued that his client was not nocent of the crime.
(393) The defense attorney argued that the witness's testimony was unreliable.
(394) The defense attorney attempted to cross-examine into the witness's bias.
(395) The defense attorney tried to discredit the prosecution's motive theory.
(396) The defense attorney will try to make a case for his client's innocence.
(397) The judge assents to the plea bargain presented by the defense attorney.
(398) The judge allowed the defense attorney to ask an interrogatory question.
(399) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness in front of the jurymen.
(400) The defense attorney argued that the presentments were based on hearsay.
(401) The defense attorney filed a motion to dismiss the prosecutorial charges.
(402) The character witness's testimony was challenged by the defense attorney.
(403) The defense attorney had to argue the case against overwhelming evidence.
(404) The defense attorney argued that the hostile witness had a motive to lie.
(405) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness after she took the stand.
(406) The judge disaffirmed the defense attorney's argument as unsubstantiated.
(407) The witness clammed up when the defense attorney started questioning him.
(408) The witness for the plaintiff was cross-examined by the defense attorney.
(409) The defense attorney will dispute the evidence through cross-examination.
(410) The defense attorney negotiated a plea bargain on behalf of their client.
(411) The defense attorney called upon an expert witness to support their case.
(412) The eyewitness's testimony was deemed unreliable by the defense attorney.
(413) The defense attorney argued that the prosecution had fabricated evidence.
(414) The defense attorney requested to impanel a jury from a different county.
(415) The suspect's confession was voluntarily offered to the defense attorney.
(416) The suspect's confession was reluctantly offered to the defense attorney.
(417) The defense attorney emphasized the presumption of innocence of omission.
(418) The defense attorney accused the prosecutorial team of witness tampering.
(419) The defense attorney filed a motion to dismiss the case before the trial.
(420) The defense attorney's questioning was designed to distort the testimony.
(421) The witness was coached to distort the testimony by the defense attorney.
(422) The defense attorney called the defendant's former employer to the stand.
(423) The defense attorney challenged the credibility of the aliunde witnesses.
(424) The defense attorney presented strong evidence to help acquit his client.
(425) The defense attorney was able to acquit his client due to a technicality.
(426) The defense attorney argued for a plea bargain instead of going to trial.
(427) The defense attorney argued a convincing case for his client's innocence.
(428) The defense attorney questioned the credibility of the forensic evidence.
(429) The defense attorney claimed that the abettals were coerced into helping.
(430) The judge dismissed the conclusory argument made by the defense attorney.
(431) The defense attorney argued that there was no proof of felonious conduct.
(432) The defense attorney requested a jury off the case due to potential bias.
(433) The defense attorney had to subpoena up the medical records for the case.
(434) The defense attorney argued against the indictment under double jeopardy.
(435) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness's deposition on the stand.
(436) The defense attorney tried to judge out any evidence of police misconduct.
(437) The defense attorney challenged the admissibility of the hearsay evidence.
(438) The judge acceded to the defense attorney's request for a change of venue.
(439) The witness was accosted by the defense attorney during cross-examination.
(440) The defendant was evading conviction by hiring a skilled defense attorney.
(441) The veracity of the witness's account was doubted by the defense attorney.
(442) The district attorney is working on a plea deal with the defense attorney.
(443) The defense attorney presented a strong alibi that couldn't be overlooked.
(444) The defense attorney objected to the indictment in this round of the case.
(445) The defense attorney requested a recess before the witness took the stand.
(446) The suspect's defense attorney challenged the legality of the wiretapping.
(447) The defense attorney's strong arguments led to the client being acquitted.
(448) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness to challenge her averment.
(449) The defense attorney called into question the reliability of the averment.
(450) The trial judge allowed the defense attorney to cross-examine the witness.
(451) The defense attorney argued that the prosecutorial charges were unfounded.
(452) The defense attorney will seek clemency for his client's harsh punishment.
(453) The defense attorney denied any countercharging on behalf of their client.
(454) The defense attorney argued successfully, and the defendant was acquitted.
(455) The defense attorney tried to convince the jury to not convict his client.
(456) The prosecutor and defense attorney have different roles in the courtroom.
(457) The participant in the mock trial played the role of the defense attorney.
(458) The defendant's defense attorney cross-examined the prosecution's witness.
(459) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness who had testified earlier.
(460) The defense attorney argued that there was reason to dispute the evidence.
(461) The defense attorney demanded substantiation of the prosecution's charges.
(462) The defense attorney requested a directed verdict due to lack of evidence.
(463) The defense attorney requested a continuance due to a scheduling conflict.
(464) The defense attorney's pettifoggeries were quickly dismissed by the judge.
(465) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness who had testified on oath.
(466) The defense attorney accused the prosecution's witness of lying under oath.
(467) The judge evaluated the logical argument presented by the defense attorney.
(468) The defense attorney presented a strong case for the defendant's innocuity.
(469) The defense attorney sought to exclude the hearsay evidence from the trial.
(470) The defense attorney argued their client's innocence in the criminal court.
(471) The defense attorney used the direct examination to introduce new evidence.
(472) The suspect during the trial was represented by a skilled defense attorney.
(473) The defense attorney requested to remand the evidence for further analysis.
(474) The judge rejects the defense attorney's objection and allows the evidence.
(475) The defense attorney's cross-examination helped the defendant beat the rap.
(476) The defense attorney failed to prevent the jury from convicting his client.
(477) The defense attorney exposed the false witness's motive for lying in court.
(478) The judge asked the defense attorney to strike an objection from the trial.
(479) The defense attorney will summon to the bar character witnesses to testify.
(480) The defense attorney argued for the presumption of innocence of commission.
(481) The witness statements will show to have been seen by the defense attorney.
(482) The judge was taken to task by the defense attorney for his biased rulings.
(483) The defense attorney urged his client to ask for clemency as a last resort.
(484) The defense attorney accused the police of conspiring to withhold evidence.
(485) The defense attorney attempted to distort the testimony of the key witness.
(486) The defense attorney called the defendant's character witness to the stand.
(487) The defense attorney tried to alleger that the evidence was circumstantial.
(488) The defense attorney argued for a lighter sentence at the quarter sessions.
(489) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness on their aliunde testimony.
(490) The defense attorney challenged the credibility of the witness's testimony.
(491) The convict's defense attorney argued that the evidence was circumstantial.
(492) The defense attorney argued that there were grounds to dispute the verdict.
(493) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness who had testified in court.
(494) The defense attorney prepared the defendant for his testification in court.
(495) The defense attorney will challenge any attempt to indict without evidence.
(496) The defense attorney was able to successfully rebut the prosecution's case.
(497) The defense attorney presented a strong argument to the jury into the case.
(498) The witness for the prosecution was cross-examined by the defense attorney.
(499) The defense attorney challenged the prosecutorial interpretation of the law.
(500) The defense attorney requested more time before arraigning upon the charges.
(501) The defense attorney challenged the authenticity of the admissible evidence.
(502) The defense attorney challenged the credibility of the witness on the stand.
(503) The defense attorney argued against the judge's decision to issue a warrant.
(504) The defense attorney accused the hostile witness of exaggerating the events.
(505) The defense attorney argued that the indictments were politically motivated.
(506) The defense attorney filed a motion to suppress evidence in the indictments.
(507) The presumption of innocence can be protected by a skilled defense attorney.
(508) The defense attorney requested to remand the case for further investigation.
(509) The guilty party's defense attorney attempted to cast doubt on the evidence.
(510) The defense attorney challenged the officer's probable cause for the arrest.
(511) The legality of the wiretap was challenged in court by the defense attorney.
(512) The defense attorney presented compelling evidence to reject the accusation.
(513) The defense attorney argued that the witness had a motive to commit perjury.
(514) The witnesses were sequestered by the defense attorney to prepare for trial.
(515) The judge gave the nod to the defense attorney to cross-examine the witness.
(516) The defense attorney filed a motion to dismiss the indictment in this round.
(517) The defense attorney argued for the jury to presume innocence of negligence.
(518) The defense attorney argued passionately for his client to plead not guilty.
(519) The defense attorney argued that the accusations were arraign beyond reason.
(520) The defense attorney tried to arraign beyond the credibility of the witness.
(521) The defense attorney argued that the witness had a motive to lie under oath.
(522) The defense attorney argued for an acquittal on the grounds of self-defense.
(523) The defendant's defense attorney cross-examined the prosecution's witnesses.
(524) The defense attorney's cross-examination led to an acquittal for his client.
(525) The defense attorney was able to acquit his client by proving his innocence.
(526) The autocratic judge did not allow any objections from the defense attorney.
(527) The court remanded the case to the defense attorney for further preparation.
(528) The judge decided to suspend proceedings, but the defense attorney objected.
(529) The defense attorney attempted to nullify up through the victim's statement.
(530) The defense attorney's counterpleas were based on a technicality in the law.
(531) The defense attorney tried to discredit the incriminatory witness testimony.
(532) The defense attorney argued that the confession was not admissible evidence.
(533) The avouchment of the police officer was challenged by the defense attorney.
(534) The defense attorney argued that the declarants' statements were unreliable.
(535) The defense attorney was able to trace a weapon used in a self-defense case.
(536) The defense attorney requested a copy of the autopsy report to use in court.
(537) The defense attorney attempted to aver that the evidence was circumstantial.
(538) The witness clammed up when the defense attorney began to cross-examine her.
(539) The defense attorney was accused of trying to suborn perjury from a witness.
(540) The convict in the court case was represented by a skilled defense attorney.
(541) The defense attorney filed a subpoena onto the hospital for medical records.
(542) The defense attorney requested to arraign their client in a different court.
(543) The defense attorney cross-examined the witness on their previous statements.
(544) The defense attorney requested a lenient legal sentence for his young client.
(545) The defense attorney argued that the hostile witness had a personal vendetta.
(546) The defense attorney will dispute the validity of the prosecution's evidence.
(547) The defense attorney was accused of trying to suborn perjury from his client.
(548) The defense attorney objected to a question while the witness was testifying.
(549) The defense attorney presented compelling evidence to exonerate their client.
(550) The defense attorney argued that the prosecutions were politically motivated.
Defense Attorney meaning
Defense attorney is a term used to describe a legal professional who represents individuals or organizations that have been accused of committing a crime. The role of a defense attorney is to provide legal counsel and representation to their clients, ensuring that their rights are protected and that they receive a fair trial. If you are writing an article or essay that involves the use of the term "defense attorney," there are several tips that you can follow to ensure that you are using the term correctly and effectively.
1. Understand the Role of a Defense Attorney Before using the term "defense attorney" in your writing, it is important to have a clear understanding of what this term means. A defense attorney is a legal professional who represents individuals or organizations that have been accused of committing a crime. They work to protect the rights of their clients and ensure that they receive a fair trial.
2. Use the Term in Context When using the term "defense attorney" in your writing, it is important to use it in the appropriate context.
For example, if you are discussing a criminal trial, you might say "the defendant's defense attorney argued that the prosecution had not provided sufficient evidence to support their case." This use of the term makes it clear that the attorney is representing the defendant in a criminal trial.
3. Be Clear and Concise When using the term "defense attorney" in your writing, it is important to be clear and concise. Avoid using overly complex language or convoluted sentence structures that might confuse your readers. Instead, use simple, straightforward language that clearly conveys your meaning.
4. Use the Term Consistently If you are using the term "defense attorney" multiple times in your writing, it is important to use it consistently. This means using the same spelling and capitalization every time you use the term.
For example, you might choose to capitalize the term every time you use it, or you might choose to use lowercase letters throughout.
5. Provide Contextual Information When using the term "defense attorney" in your writing, it can be helpful to provide additional contextual information to help your readers understand the role of this legal professional.
For example, you might explain that defense attorneys are often hired by individuals who cannot afford to pay for legal representation themselves.
In conclusion, the term "defense attorney" is an important legal term that is used to describe a legal professional who represents individuals or organizations that have been accused of committing a crime. By following these tips, you can use this term effectively in your writing and ensure that your readers understand its meaning and significance.
The word usage examples above have been gathered from various sources to reflect current and historical usage of the word Defense Attorney. They do not represent the opinions of TranslateEN.com.