Defense Team in a sentence

(1) The defense team filed an appeal.

(2) The defendant's defense team filed an appeal.

(3) The dossier was compiled by the defense team.

(4) The ruling was a triumph for the defense team.

(5) The defense team was relieved by the hung jury.

(6) The defense team called for a new trial strategy.

(7) The defense team celebrated the nol pros outcome.

(8) The acquittal was a victory for the defense team.

(9) The defense team presented new evidence in court.

(10) The defense team prepared their client for trial.

Defense Team sentence

(11) The appealer's defense team argued for a mistrial.

(12) The defendant's defense team appealed the verdict.

(13) The dossier was a vital tool for the defense team.

(14) The defense team presented a strong case in court.

(15) The trial order was challenged by the defense team.

(16) Defend with a well-trained and skilled defense team.

(17) The indictment was a challenge for the defense team.

(18) The lawyer's defense team included expert witnesses.

(19) The defense team filed a motion to dismiss the case.

(20) The defense team worked hard to acquit their client.

Defense Team make sentence

(21) The defense team's cross-examination was impressive.

(22) The defense team is preparing for the trail by jury.

(23) The defense team presented an alibi for their client.

(24) The suspect's defense team is calling for a mistrial.

(25) The defense team is preparing to dispute the verdict.

(26) The defense team called several witnesses to testify.

(27) The defense team filed a motion to suppress evidence.

(28) The defense team called an expert witness to testify.

(29) The defense team worked hard to prevail with evidence.

(30) The appealer's defense team argued for a plea bargain.

Sentence of defense team

(31) The dossier was a valuable asset for the defense team.

(32) The defense team presented a strong argument in court.

(33) The defense team filed a motion to quash the subpoenas.

(34) The defense team called several witnesses to the stand.

(35) The defense team argued that their client was innocent.

(36) The defense team filed a motion to dismiss the charges.

(37) The hung jury left the defense team with mixed emotions.

(38) The indictment was a major setback for the defense team.

(39) The defense team appealed the verdict to a higher court.

(40) The defense team called in an expert witness to testify.

Defense Team meaningful sentence

(41) The judge's ruling is being disputed by the defense team.

(42) The jury is out of sync with the defense team's strategy.

(43) The civil defense team responded quickly to the disaster.

(44) The defense team filed an appeal to dispute the sentence.

(45) The defendant's defense team presented a compelling case.

(46) The defense team filed a motion to dismiss the indictment.

(47) The defense team prepared the client to testify in person.

(48) The criminal's defense team argued for a plea of insanity.

(49) The defendant's sentence was appealed by his defense team.

(50) The convict's defense team filed a motion for a new trial.

Defense Team sentence examples

(51) The defense team celebrated the acquittal of their client.

(52) The defense team filed a motion for discovery of evidence.

(53) The civil defense team was well-prepared for any emergency.

(54) The defense team filed a motion to dismiss the indictments.

(55) The defense team presented a strong alibi defense strategy.

(56) The defense team worked hard to inculpate the real culprit.

(57) The defense team presented a strong alibi for their client.

(58) The defense team is confident they can dispute the verdict.

(59) The defense team is filing a motion to dispute the verdict.

(60) The defense team's job is to protect their client's rights.

Sentence with defense team

(61) The defense team requested a change of venue for the trial.

(62) The defense team is filing an appeal to dispute the verdict.

(63) The appealer's defense team presented new evidence in court.

(64) The defense team tried to discredit the witness's testimony.

(65) The defense team is questioning the validity of the verdict.

(66) The defense team cross-examined the prosecution's witnesses.

(67) The defense team argued that the subpoenas were overly broad.

(68) The defense team challenged the accuracy of the charge sheet.

(69) The defense team hoped to overturn through an appeal process.

(70) The defendant's acquittal was a victory for his defense team.

Use defense team in a sentence

(71) The defense team's strategy led to the defendant's acquittal.

(72) The defense team presented strong evidence for the acquittal.

(73) The civil defense team was trained to respond to emergencies.

(74) The defendant's acquittal was a victory for the defense team.

(75) The suspect's defense team is arguing for a plea of insanity.

(76) The defense team prepared their client's testimony carefully.

(77) The defense team's job is to defend their client's interests.

(78) The defense team negotiated a plea deal with the prosecution.

(79) The defense team argued that the evidence was circumstantial.

(80) The defense team will dispute the parole eligibility criteria.

Sentence using defense team

(81) The defense team is gathering evidence to dispute the verdict.

(82) The defense team's job is to challenge the prosecution's case.

(83) The defense team presented compelling arguments for a nol pros.

(84) The defense team is gathering evidence to dispute the sentence.

(85) The defense team strategized on how to depose during the trial.

(86) The defense team attempted to discredit the adducer's evidence.

(87) The defense team is considering whether to dispute the verdict.

(88) The defense team requested a mistrial, but the judge denied it.

(89) The defense team requested a continuance to prepare their case.

(90) The defense team requested a mistrial during the jury by trial.

Defense Team example sentence

(91) The defense team filed a pretrial motion to dismiss the charges.

(92) The appeal by the defense team alleged prosecutorial misconduct.

(93) The defense team will decry the charge as a violation of rights.

(94) The recusation of the defense team was seen as a strategic move.

(95) The defense team is trying to find a way to dispute the verdict.

(96) The indictment was a source of frustration for the defense team.

(97) The defense team presented new evidence to dispute the sentence.

(98) The defendant's defense team filed a motion to dismiss the case.

(99) The hung jury left the defense team hopeful for a better outcome.

(100) The assoilment of the suspect was a victory for the defense team.

Sentence with word defense team

(101) The defendant's defense team called several witnesses to testify.

(102) The defense team's closing statement was powerful and convincing.

(103) The defense team hired a private investigator to gather evidence.

(104) The defense team argued that the subpoenas were an abuse of power.

(105) The defense team is filing an appeal to dispute the final verdict.

(106) The defense team argued that the inculpating evidence was planted.

(107) The defense team suspected the police of withholding key evidence.

(108) The acquittal of the defendant was a victory for the defense team.

(109) The defense team requested a mistrial due to jury into misconduct.

(110) The defense team's strategy resulted in the defendant's acquittal.

Sentence of defense team

(111) The acquittal was a result of the defendant's strong defense team.

(112) The defense team is gathering new evidence to dispute the verdict.

(113) The defense team was able to dispute the accuracy of the evidence.

(114) The defense team requested a jury instruction on reasonable doubt.

(115) The defense team's strategy was aimed at exculpating their client.

(116) The defense team presented false evidence to distort the testimony.

(117) The assoilment of the defendant was a triumph for the defense team.

(118) The defense team challenged the authenticity of the corpus delicti.

(119) The defense team requested that the juryman be dismissed for cause.

(120) The defense team is presenting new evidence to dispute the verdict.

Defense Team used in a sentence

(121) The defendant's defense team called several witnesses to the stand.

(122) The defense team was confident that they could acquit their client.

(123) The acquittal was a testament to the hard work of the defense team.

(124) The defendant's confession was deemed spurious by the defense team.

(125) The defense team's role is to ensure a fair trial for their client.

(126) The defense team argued that the autopsy was flawed and unreliable.

(127) The defense team objected to the prosecution's line of questioning.

(128) The defense team filed a motion to suppress the admissible evidence.

(129) The defense team challenged the admissibility of the search warrant.

(130) The defense team will dispute the evidence based on new information.

Defense Team sentence in English

(131) The defense team requested to arraign beyond the scope of the trial.

(132) The defense team did their best, but I still agree with the verdict.

(133) The defense team was successful in inculpating the real perpetrator.

(134) The civil defense team was ready to respond in case of an emergency.

(135) The civil defense team worked together to keep their community safe.

(136) The president's defense team argued that he should not be impeached.

(137) The defense team argued that the witness's testimony was unreliable.

(138) The defense team celebrated their client's acquittal with champagne.

(139) The defense team was able to find a witness to dispute the evidence.

(140) The defense team hoped to prevail upon a witness to provide an alibi.

(141) The defendant's guilty plea was a strategic move by his defense team.

(142) The defense team is hoping to quash the case before it goes to trial.

(143) The defense team filed a motion to suppress the evidentiary evidence.

(144) The defense team requested to impanel a jury from a different county.

(145) The defense team presented evidence that warranted a lesser sentence.

(146) The defense team presented strong evidence that led to the acquittal.

(147) The ruling was unexpected, but it was a victory for the defense team.

(148) The defense team worked tirelessly to prove their client's innocence.

(149) The defense team presented compelling evidence to acquit their client.

(150) The defense team argued for dismissal of the indictment in this round.

(151) The suspect's alibi will be thoroughly questioned by the defense team.

(152) The witness was surprised to receive a subpoena from the defense team.

(153) The defense team filed a motion to dismiss the case based on barretry.

(154) The defense team was pleased with the outcome of the directed verdict.

(155) The acquittals were seen as a victory for the defense team's strategy.

(156) The defense team's cross-examination led to the defendant's acquittal.

(157) The defense team argued for an acquittal on the grounds of entrapment.

(158) The defendant's defense team presented a compelling argument in court.

(159) The defendant's defense team filed an appeal after the guilty verdict.

(160) The defense team is arguing that the jury was biased in their verdict.

(161) The defense team is gathering evidence to dispute the probation ruling.

(162) The defense team called character witnesses in this round of the trial.

(163) The defendant's defense team worked hard to assoil them of the charges.

(164) The defendant's defense team argued that he was acting in self-defense.

(165) The indictment was a difficult hurdle for the defense team to overcome.

(166) The defense team was able to successfully dispute some of the evidence.

(167) The defense team argued that the evidentiary standard had not been met.

(168) The defense team presented a strong alibi for their client's innocence.

(169) The defense team is working hard to prove that the case is not triable.

(170) The defense team plans to dispute the evidence through expert testimony.

(171) The defense team intends to dispute the parole eligibility requirements.

(172) The defense team was able to acquit their client through a plea bargain.

(173) The defense team's strategy was to discredit the prosecution's evidence.

(174) The defense team was disappointed with the outcome of the jury by trial.

(175) The defense team decided to subpoena out the expert witness for the case.

(176) The defense team is confident that the alibi will exonerate their client.

(177) The defendant's acquittal was a triumph for his defense team's hard work.

(178) The defendant's defense team argued that the evidence was circumstantial.

(179) The defense team appealed the verdict, but the appellate court upheld it.

(180) The defense team filed a motion to quash the subpoenas on privacy grounds.

(181) The defense team challenged the admissibility of the surveillance footage.

(182) The exoneration of the defendant was a major victory for the defense team.

(183) The defense team is preparing to dispute the extradition on legal grounds.

(184) The defense team argued that the prosecution's case was built on barretry.

(185) The civil defense team trained regularly to be prepared for any situation.

(186) The defense team worked hard to establish a strong alibi for their client.

(187) The defendant's claim innocence was met with sympathy by the defense team.

(188) The convict's defense team tried to appeal the verdict, but it was denied.

(189) The convict's defense team tried to discredit the prosecution's witnesses.

(190) The civil defense team was prepared to respond to any emergency situation.

(191) The defense team was able to dispute the chain of custody of the evidence.

(192) The confutations presented by the defense team were weak and unconvincing.

(193) The defense team argued that the jurymen were biased against their client.

(194) The defense team called several witnesses to refute the trialist's claims.

(195) The defense team's job is to protect their client from unjust accusations.

(196) The defense team filed a motion to suppress the wiretap evidence in court.

(197) The defense team filed an appeal based on the jury into selection process.

(198) The civil defense team conducted regular exercises to test their readiness.

(199) The appeal by the defense team focused on the credibility of a key witness.

(200) The recusation of the defense team was seen as an attempt to gain sympathy.

(201) The remanding of the suspect was met with skepticism from the defense team.

(202) The defense team is looking for any inconsistencies to dispute the verdict.

(203) The defense team worked tirelessly to secure an acquittal for their client.

(204) The defense team is claiming that the verdict was based on faulty evidence.

(205) The defense team was unsuccessful in their attempt to dispute the evidence.

(206) The defense team's success depends on their ability to build a strong case.

(207) The defense team requested a mistrial due to misconduct by the prosecution.

(208) The accused's defense team was no match for the condemnor's legal expertise.

(209) The defense team argued that the prosecution had overlooked a crucial alibi.

(210) The defense team requested a change of venue for the next round of hearings.

(211) The defense team prepared their case after the defendant pleaded not guilty.

(212) The defense team called multiple witnesses to try and prevail with evidence.

(213) The suspect's defense team is calling for a mistrial due to jury misconduct.

(214) The defense team was able to prove their client's alibi with video evidence.

(215) The defense team argued against remand, but the judge ultimately ordered it.

(216) The defense team's strategy paid off when their client was found not guilty.

(217) The defense team tried to dispute the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(218) The argumentations presented by the defense team were weak and unconvincing.

(219) The defense team's job is to ensure that their client receives a fair trial.

(220) The defense team sought a subpoena for the medical examiner's autopsy report.

(221) The defense team will dispute the evidence by pointing out procedural errors.

(222) The false witness's credibility was called into question by the defense team.

(223) The defense team presented a strong case but failed to prevail with evidence.

(224) The accused's defense team called several witnesses to testify on his behalf.

(225) The rearguard of the defense team was able to block the opposing team's shot.

(226) The defendant's acquittal was a result of the defense team's strong argument.

(227) The defense team presented a compelling alibi for their client's whereabouts.

(228) The defense team was able to successfully acquit their client of all charges.

(229) The defense team presented a strong case and was able to acquit their client.

(230) The defense team was able to dispute the credibility of some of the evidence.

(231) The media's coverage of the trial was deemed prejudicial by the defense team.

(232) The defense team will now have to prepare a strategy to fight the indictment.

(233) The defense team was surprised when the jury came back with a guilty verdict.

(234) The defense team planned to subpoena out the DNA expert for cross-examination.

(235) The defense team hired a private investigator to gather evidence of a frameup.

(236) The defense team argued that the judge's bias affected their client adversely.

(237) The defense team challenged the compellable nature of the witness's statement.

(238) The defense team is preparing a strong case to seek clemency for their client.

(239) After the admission of the new evidence, the defense team requested a retrial.

(240) The defense team tried to nullify the evidence presented against their client.

(241) The defense team requested a jury off the robbery trial due to media coverage.

(242) The defense team will dispute the evidence by challenging the chain of custody.

(243) The defense team argued that the police had intentionally overlooked the alibi.

(244) The defense team worked tirelessly to establish a solid alibi for their client.

(245) The defense team's strong argument convinced the judge to declare her innocent.

(246) The acquittal of the defendant was a long-awaited outcome for his defense team.

(247) The defense team presented a strong case, leading to the defendant's acquittal.

(248) The defendant's defense team called several witnesses to testify on his behalf.

(249) The defense team attempted to invalidate against the prosecution's key witness.

(250) The defense team hired a private investigator to uncover any withheld evidence.

(251) The defense team presented multiple alibis to support their client's innocence.

(252) The defense team hired a psychiatrist to evaluate the defendant's imputability.

(253) The defense team argued that the prosecution had not met their burden of proof.

(254) The defense team sought a subpoena for the medical examiner's toxicology report.

(255) The defense team will dispute the evidence by presenting an alternative suspect.

(256) The defense team will dispute the evidence by arguing for a lack of opportunity.

(257) The defense team worked tirelessly to establish a strong alibi for their client.

(258) The defense team believed that the judge's bias affected their client adversely.

(259) The defense team requested a reinvestigation of the evidence presented in court.

(260) The defense team presented strong evidence leading to the defendant's acquittal.

(261) The defendant's acquittal was a testament to the power of a strong defense team.

(262) The defense team called an expert witness to refute the prosecution's testimony.

(263) The defense team is claiming that the verdict was influenced by outside factors.

(264) The defendant's defense team called expert witnesses to testify on their behalf.

(265) The defense team's efforts paid off when the jury returned a not guilty verdict.

(266) The defense team filed a motion to dismiss the charges, but the judge denied it.

(267) The defense team argued that the warrant by the evidence was obtained illegally.

(268) The defense team is confident they can successfully dispute the probation ruling.

(269) The accused's defense team struggled to counter the condemnor's strong arguments.

(270) The defense team sought a subpoena of the police reports related to the incident.

(271) The defense team hired an expert to challenge the authentication of the evidence.

(272) The defense team will file a motion to exclude certain witnesses from testifying.

(273) The defense team objected to the admissibility of the polygraph test as evidence.

(274) The defense team filed several demurrers to challenge the prosecution's evidence.

(275) The defense team will dispute the evidence, but the prosecution has a confession.

(276) The jury was split on the decision, so the defense team will dispute the verdict.

(277) The defense team presented strong evidence that led to the defendant's acquittal.

(278) The defense team's goal is to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.

(279) The defense team cross-examined the victim, and their testimony was inconsistent.

(280) The defense team argued that the conviction was based on circumstantial evidence.

(281) The defendant's defense team argued that the manslaughter charge was unjustified.

(282) The defense team presented a compelling argument, but the jurors were not swayed.

(283) The defense team requested a change of venue to ensure a fair jury into the case.

(284) The defense team believed that the judge's bias influenced their client adversely.

(285) The defense team requested additional time to prepare for this round of the trial.

(286) The defense team worked tirelessly to establish a solid alibi and avoid any abuse.

(287) The recusation of the defense team was seen as a strategic move to gain advantage.

(288) The defense team was concerned about the potential biases of the empaneled jurors.

(289) The defense team prepared extensively to question the testifiers during the trial.

(290) The defense team argued that the prosecution was trying to indict through hearsay.

(291) The defense team argued that the sentence was too harsh and needed to be disputed.

(292) The defense team was able to prove their client's alibi with credit card receipts.

(293) The defense team will dispute the evidence, yet the prosecution has a strong case.

(294) The defendant's defense team argued that he was coerced into committing the crime.

(295) The civil defense team is responsible for coordinating emergency response efforts.

(296) The civil defense team works to minimize the impact of disasters on the community.

(297) The defense team is arguing that the sentence is too harsh and plans to dispute it.

(298) The evidence was sequestered from the defense team until it was presented in court.

(299) The prosecution challenged the reliability of a witness called by the defense team.

(300) The prosecutor's strategy was odd up to the trial, making the defense team nervous.

(301) The defense team worked tirelessly to ensure their client would be proven innocent.

(302) The judge allowed the defense team to interrogate witnesses to ensure a fair trial.

(303) The defense team carefully reviewed the impanelling records to ensure a fair trial.

(304) The president's defense team argued that the impeachment was politically motivated.

(305) The defense team presented a strong case, leading to the acquittal of their client.

(306) The defense team presented a compelling case that led to the defendant's acquittal.

(307) The defense team's argument was based on the lack of evidence against their client.

(308) The defense team presented a strong case, but the prosecution was equally prepared.

(309) The defense team presented a plea bargain to the prosecution, but they rejected it.

(310) The controversial decision of the jury was heavily controverted by the defense team.

(311) The defense team objected to the admissibility of the defendant's prior convictions.

(312) The civil defense team collaborated with neighboring communities to share resources.

(313) The defense team wanted to subpoena out the computer expert to analyze the evidence.

(314) The defense team hired a renowned expert to authenticate the evidence independently.

(315) The defense team's thorough investigation led to the defendant being found innocent.

(316) The defendant's defense team argued that there was no evidence of bloodguiltinesses.

(317) The defense team filed a motion to dismiss the indictments, but the judge denied it.

(318) The defense team is hoping to reach a plea deal before the case is brought to trial.

(319) The defense team tried to cast doubt on the evidence used to inculpate their client.

(320) The defense team argued that the sentence was too lenient and needed to be disputed.

(321) The defendant's defense team had presented a strong case which led to the acquittal.

(322) The defense team tried to prove that the defendant did not commit a capital offense.

(323) The defendant's cop a plea decision was seen as a strategic move by his defense team.

(324) The defense team presented multiple witnesses to establish the defendant's innocuity.

(325) The defense team attempted to distort the testimony by presenting selective evidence.

(326) The defense team will file a motion to exclude certain exhibits from being presented.

(327) The defense team will file a motion to exclude certain evidence from being presented.

(328) The defendant's defense team argued that the wiretap evidence was obtained illegally.

(329) The defense team requested a delay in the empanelling process to review new evidence.

(330) The defense team's counterpleas were seen as a last-ditch effort to avoid conviction.

(331) The defense team argued that the evidence was not enough to incriminate their client.

(332) The defense team presented strong evidence that led to the acquittal of their client.

(333) The defense team presented a strong case, resulting in the defendant being acquitted.

(334) The defense team's strategy was successful in acquitting their client of all charges.

(335) The defense team challenged the warrant by the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(336) The defense team's approach was to belabor the evidence and challenge its credibility.

(337) The defendant's self-incrimination was seen as a strategic move by their defense team.

(338) The defense team wanted to subpoena out the forensic expert to challenge the evidence.

(339) The defense team sought a subpoena of the text messages exchanged between the parties.

(340) The defense team filed a motion to suppress the subpoena amid the suppression hearing.

(341) The defense team argued that the evidence was circumstantial during the jury by trial.

(342) The defense team filed a motion to dismiss the indictments, citing a lack of evidence.

(343) The defense team argued that the police had fabricated evidence to frame their client.

(344) The defense team worked hard to minimize any inconsistencies in the defendant's alibi.

(345) The defense team argued that the prosecution was trying to indict through speculation.

(346) The defense team was able to dispute the timeline of events presented in the evidence.

(347) The defense team will dispute the evidence, but the prosecution has physical evidence.

(348) The defendant's defense team called several expert witnesses to testify on his behalf.

(349) The judge signed the death warrant, but the defense team plans to appeal the decision.

(350) Bittakers' defense team argued that they were mentally ill and should not be executed.

(351) The defendant's defense team presented a compelling argument for their not guilty plea.

(352) The defense team will argue that the defendant's alibi is consistent with the evidence.

(353) The defense team argued that the wiretaps were tampered with and should be disregarded.

(354) The defense team plans to question the credibility of the prosecution's alibi evidence.

(355) The lawyer's back ground in criminal law made her a valuable asset to the defense team.

(356) The defense team hired a second medical examiner to dispute the presence of lividities.

(357) The witness statements were reinvestigated by the defense team to uncover new evidence.

(358) The defendant's defense team presented a strong case, but the prosecution was stronger.

(359) The defense team presented a compelling argument, leading to the defendant's acquittal.

(360) The defense team was confident in their case, leading to the acquittal of their client.

(361) The civil defense team works closely with local law enforcement and emergency services.

(362) The defense team's strategy was to highlight inconsistencies in the prosecution's case.

(363) The defense team's argument was based on the principle of innocent until proven guilty.

(364) The defense team presented a compelling alibi that cast doubt on the prosecution's case.

(365) The accused's guilty plea to cocaine charges was a strategic move by their defense team.

(366) The stay of execution was granted, giving the defense team more time to gather evidence.

(367) The defense team appealed the verdict, citing errors in the handling of the indictments.

(368) The defense team accused the prosecution of suppressing evidence to secure a conviction.

(369) The litigation strategy employed by the defense team was successful in winning the case.

(370) The dossier was submitted as evidence, but the defense team challenged its authenticity.

(371) The convict's defense team tried to argue that he was coerced into committing the crime.

(372) The defendant's defense team argued that the evidence was circumstantial and unreliable.

(373) The defendant's defense team presented a strong case, leading to his eventual acquittal.

(374) The acquittal was a result of the defense team's thorough investigation and preparation.

(375) The defense team's strategy was to belabor the evidence and present alternative theories.

(376) The defense team attempted to distort the testimony by presenting misleading information.

(377) The prosecution's case was weak, and the defense team was able to exculpate their client.

(378) The counterevidence presented by the defense team was enough to sway the jury's decision.

(379) The defense team worked hard to prevent any evidence that could incriminate their client.

(380) The defense team's strategy was to discredit the evidence used to inculpate their client.

(381) The defendant's defense team presented evidence that contradicted the prosecution's case.

(382) The defense team will dispute the evidence, but the prosecution has a reliable informant.

(383) The defense team requested a delay in the remand order, but the judge denied the request.

(384) The defendant's defense team presented a compelling argument, resulting in his acquittal.

(385) The defense team's strategy of attacking the prosecution's evidence led to the acquittal.

(386) The defense team is hoping that the prosecution will not indict near the end of the case.

(387) The defense team is confident they can successfully dispute the probation terms on appeal.

(388) The defense team emphasized the importance of the jury to presume innocence of negligence.

(389) The defense team filed a motion to suppress evidence in an effort to malt up to the trial.

(390) The stay of execution was granted, giving the defense team more time to prepare an appeal.

(391) The defense team is considering whether to challenge jurisdiction based on a technicality.

(392) The defense team requested to reinvestigate the crime scene in hopes of finding new leads.

(393) The defense team's thorough investigation helped to exonerate their client of all charges.

(394) The victim's family accused the defense team of suppressing justice by delaying the trial.

(395) The defense team's cross-examination nullified away against the prosecution's key witness.

(396) The defense team relied heavily on exculpations to try and prove their client's innocence.

(397) The defense team requested to suspend proceedings, but the prosecution opposed the motion.

(398) The prosecution asked to suspend proceedings, and the defense team objected to the motion.

(399) The defense team requested an independent autopsy to challenge the prosecution's evidence.

(400) The defense team requested a change of venue, and the trial was moved to a different city.

(401) Despite the defense team's best efforts, the jury found their client guilty on all counts.

(402) The defense team presented expert testimony to prove that the evidence had been fabricated.

(403) The defense team argued that the accusations were arraign beyond the defendant's character.

(404) The defense team presented a detailed timeline to establish a solid alibi for their client.

(405) The defense team will ask for acquittal for their client if they can prove their innocence.

(406) The defense team hired a private investigator to interrogate witnesses and gather evidence.

(407) The defense team argued that the prosecution's expert witness was inadmissibly unqualified.

(408) The defense team is gathering evidence to prevent their client from being brought to trial.

(409) The defense team argued that the defendant was acting in self-defense, and the jury agreed.

(410) The prosecution presented a strong case, but the defense team was able to poke holes in it.

(411) The defendant's defense team argued that the victim had falsely accused him of groping her.

(412) The defense team is hoping to convince the grand jury not to indict by presenting an alibi.

(413) The convict's defense team appealed the conviction on the grounds of insufficient evidence.

(414) The defense team argued that the warrant by the evidence was not sufficient to prove guilt.

(415) The defense team will dispute the evidence by challenging the authenticity of the documents.

(416) The defense team presented a compelling case that led to the defendant being found innocent.

(417) The defense team requested to arraign beyond the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses.

(418) The defense team tried to appeal the murder conviction, but their efforts were unsuccessful.

(419) The surface-to-surface radar system detected incoming missiles and alerted the defense team.

(420) The defense team made a strategic decision not to make a call to the stand for their client.

(421) The defense team worked tirelessly to ensure their client would be acquitted on all charges.

(422) The defense team argued that the material witness was unreliable and had a history of lying.

(423) The judge's reprieve of the defendant's sentence was seen as a victory for the defense team.

(424) The defense team requested a joinder of the charges, and the prosecution reluctantly agreed.

(425) The defense team is preparing for an indictment by gathering evidence to refute the charges.

(426) The acquittal of the defendant was a result of a thorough investigation by the defense team.

(427) The defense team's strategy was successful in getting their client acquitted of all charges.

(428) The defense team believes there were errors in the trial, and they will dispute the verdict.

(429) The prosecution requested to suspend proceedings, and the defense team agreed to the motion.

(430) The defense team's strategy was to belabor the evidence and present alternative explanations.

(431) The accused's defense team presented a strong argument for a lesser charge than manslaughter.

(432) The defense team is arguing that the sentence does not fit the crime and plans to dispute it.

(433) The convict's defense team argued that he was not worth of the charges due to lack of motive.

(434) The defense team's decision to challenge jurisdiction led to a change in venue for the trial.

(435) The defense team is working to prevent the prosecution from being able to file an indictment.

(436) The defense team presented compelling evidence to advocate for the innocence of their client.

(437) The defense team carefully reviewed the impanelling records to identify any potential issues.

(438) The defense team was able to acquit their client by exposing flaws in the prosecution's case.

(439) The judge ordered the defendant's remand, and the defense team began preparing for an appeal.

(440) The defense team argued that the gag order was an infringement on their right to a fair trial.

(441) The defense team tried to distort the testimony by casting doubt on the witness's credibility.

(442) The defendant's defense team argued that the courts-martial lacked jurisdiction over the case.

(443) The defense team tried to discredit the testifier's testimony by pointing out inconsistencies.

(444) The defense team cross-examined the prosecution's key witness, and their testimony fell apart.

(445) The defense team's approach was to belabor the evidence and challenge the prosecution's theory.

(446) The defense team sought a subpoena of the text messages exchanged between the parties involved.

(447) The defendant's defense team presented a strong case, leading to him being declared not guilty.

(448) The defense team will rely heavily on the alibi to create reasonable doubt in the jury's minds.

(449) The defense team presented new evidence that ultimately led to the exoneration of their client.

(450) The defense team may call upon character witnesses to testify about the defendant's reputation.

(451) The defense team was accused of trying to distort the testimony of the eyewitness to the crime.

(452) The defense team struggled to prevail with evidence that contradicted the eyewitness testimony.

(453) The defense team argued that the testifier's testimony was unreliable due to his poor eyesight.

(454) The defense team was pleased with the directed verdict, as it meant their client was acquitted.

(455) The defense team hired a private investigator to look into the possibility of planted evidence.

(456) The defense team argued that the evidence was circumstantial, yet the jury found it convincing.

(457) Despite the objections of the defense team, the judge allowed the impeachment trial to proceed.

(458) The defense team requested a psychiatric evaluation before the remand, but the judge denied it.

(459) The defense team's expert witnesses played a crucial role in the defendant's acquittal of guilt.

(460) The defense team hired a private investigator to authenticate the evidence against their client.

(461) The defense team filed a motion to suppress the evidentiary material obtained during the search.

(462) The defense team is preparing their case to be presented when the defendant is brought to trial.

(463) The defense team argued that the evidence was circumstantial and not enough to convict of guilt.

(464) The defense team tried to discredit the accusable witness, but their testimony held up in court.

(465) The civil defense team coordinated with local law enforcement to maintain order during the riot.

(466) The defense team attempted to discredit the expert witness, but their efforts were unsuccessful.

(467) The defense team's expert witness was able to provide enough evidence to exonerate their client.

(468) The defense team argued that the evidence presented was circumstantial, leading to an acquittal.

(469) The defense team was able to acquit their client, despite the overwhelming evidence against him.

(470) The defense team presented evidence to prove that the prosecution had fabricated the crime scene.

(471) The witnesses were sequestered by the defense team to avoid influencing each other's testimonies.

(472) The defense team worked tirelessly to gather evidence and present a solid alibi for their client.

(473) The defense team presented strong evidence to support the presumption of innocence of commission.

(474) The defense team presented a strong case, reinforcing the presumption of innocence of commission.

(475) The defense team tried to prevail upon a witness to recall specific details from the crime scene.

(476) The defense team's efforts to prevail upon a witness were unsuccessful, leading to a weaker case.

(477) The defense team's closing argument was designed to prevail upon the jury to acquit their client.

(478) The defense team objected to the call to the stand of a witness who had already been discredited.

(479) The defense team was relieved to be impaneled against a judge known for being fair and impartial.

(480) The defense team tried to discredit the corroborator's testimony, but their efforts were in vain.

(481) The defense team worked hard to prove that the evidence presented did not inculpate their client.

(482) The defense team argued that the planted evidence was a deliberate attempt to frame their client.

(483) The defense team requested a jury off the defamation trial due to the defendant's public profile.

(484) The government has decided to extradite the suspect, but the defense team is fighting against it.

(485) The defense team cross-examined the prosecution's witnesses, yet the jurors remained unconvinced.

(486) The acquittal was a result of the defense team's ability to poke holes in the prosecution's case.

(487) The acquittal was a result of the defense team's ability to cast doubt on the prosecution's case.

(488) The defense team argued that a death sentence would violate the defendant's constitutional rights.

(489) The defense team will dispute the evidence by challenging the credibility of the expert witnesses.

(490) The stay of execution was granted, giving the defense team an opportunity to present new evidence.

(491) The defense team's strategy was to prevail upon a witness to cast doubt on the prosecution's case.

(492) The murderesses' defense team argued that they were victims of abuse and should be given leniency.

(493) The defense team attempted to discredit the material witness's testimony during cross-examination.

(494) The defense team was confident that they had adducible evidence to prove their client's innocence.

(495) The defendant's defense team argued that the prosecution's case was based on baseless speculation.

(496) Breivik's defense team argued that he was not responsible for his actions, but the jury disagreed.

(497) The defense team called an expert witness to testify, and their testimony was crucial to the case.

(498) The joinder of the two cases was a strategic move by the defense team, and it paid off in the end.

(499) The defense team argued that the prosecution's case was based on hearsay, leading to an acquittal.

(500) The defense team worked tirelessly, and their efforts paid off with an acquittal for their client.

(501) After the judge declared a mistrial, the defense team requested a new trial with a different jury.

(502) The defense team called an expert witness to challenge the reliability of the compellable evidence.

(503) The defense team challenged the validity of the presumptive evidence, claiming it was contaminated.

(504) The judge's reaffirmation of the defendant's guilt was met with disappointment by the defense team.

(505) The defense team hired a private investigator to dispute the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(506) The defense team was able to prevail upon the judge to allow new evidence to be presented in court.

(507) The civil defense team is well-trained and equipped, so they are ready to respond to any emergency.

(508) Although the defense team plans to dispute the verdict, the prosecution is confident in their case.

(509) The defense team argued that the jury was biased and plans to dispute the verdict on those grounds.

(510) The defense team presented new evidence during the retrial that cast doubt on the defendant's guilt.

(511) The convict's defense team presented compelling evidence to suggest he was not worth of the charges.

(512) The defense team knew that their case would depend heavily on the strength of the defendant's alibi.

(513) The defense team accused the prosecutor of trying to prosecute beyond the jurisdiction of the court.

(514) The defense team was unable to find any inconsistencies in the corroborator's account of the events.

(515) The defense team hired their own forensic expert to challenge the validity of the bitemark evidence.

(516) The defendant's defense team argued that the punishment for a capital offense was cruel and unusual.

(517) The defense team presented an alibi for the defendant, and it was corroborated by several witnesses.

(518) The defense team worked tirelessly to exonerate their client, and their efforts paid off in the end.

(519) The defense team called several expert witnesses to testify, hoping to sway the jury in their favor.

(520) The defense team filed a motion to compel the prosecution to disclose any plans to withhold evidence.

(521) The accused murderer was found guilty of the crime, but his defense team plans to appeal the verdict.

(522) The forensic evidence was enough to implicate the defendant in spite of their defense team's efforts.

(523) The defense team's arguments were convincing enough for the judge to declare their client not guilty.

(524) The expert testimony provided by the defense team helped the accused to be exonerated from all guilt.

(525) The defense team argued that the manslayers were not in their right minds at the time of the murders.

(526) The defense team worked tirelessly to uncover exculpatory evidence that would exonerate their client.

(527) Despite their best efforts, the defense team was unable to prove that their client was not accusable.

(528) The prosecutor presented a strong case, but the defendant's defense team proved his blameless status.

(529) The defense team strategized on how to best present their case when their turn to take the stand came.

(530) The defense team hired a private investigator to uncover any fabricated evidence against their client.

(531) The defendant's defense team presented evidence to support the claim of acting in the heat of passion.

(532) The defense team called an expert witness to provide technical analysis relating to the alleged crime.

(533) The defense team submitted a written statement from a key witness who was unable to testify in person.

(534) The defense team failed to convince the jury beyond reasonable doubt that their client was not guilty.

(535) The defense team argued that the prosecution's use of a lie detector test was inadmissibly unreliable.

(536) Despite the overwhelming evidence, the defense team argued that the indictments were based on hearsay.

(537) The defense team presented a compelling argument that ultimately led to the defendant being acquitted.

(538) The defense team called a character witness to help humanize the defendant and sway the jury's opinion.

(539) The defense team successfully managed to discredit the prosecution's witness through cross-examination.

(540) The jury's decision to acquit the defendant showed that the defense team was able to prevail upon them.

(541) The defense team was surprised when the prosecutor attempted to indict outside of the original charges.

(542) The defense team tried to prevent the prosecution from indicting through by filing a motion to dismiss.

(543) The defense team worked tirelessly, and the defendant was acquitted, much to the surprise of the media.

(544) The defense team's argument was based on the fact that the prosecution had not met the burden of proof.

(545) The civil defense team worked tirelessly to evacuate residents before the wildfire reached their homes.

(546) The defense team presented evidence to show that the prosecution had misconstrued the defendant's alibi.

(547) The defense team was unsuccessful in their attempts to prevail upon a witness to recant their statement.

(548) The defense team argued that the witness's testimony was unreliable and could not lead to incrimination.

(549) The defense team is arguing that the prosecutor lacks sufficient evidence to indict by bringing charges.

(550) The coroner's findings were disputed by the defense team, who argued that the evidence was inconclusive.

The word usage examples above have been gathered from various sources to reflect current and historical usage of the word Defense Team. They do not represent the opinions of TranslateEN.com.