Prosecution in a sentence

(1) The prosecution called for a new trial.

(2) The court will hear the prosecution's case.

(3) The ruling was appealed by the prosecution.

(4) The jury is over for the prosecution's case.

(5) The barristerial prosecution was aggressive.

(6) The trial was a victory for the prosecution.

(7) The onus of proof lies with the prosecution.

(8) The jury favoured the prosecution's argument.

(9) The ruling was a setback for the prosecution.

(10) Jury aside, the prosecution's case was strong.

Prosecution sentence

(11) The evidence was withholden by the prosecution.

(12) Witness aside, the prosecution's case was weak.

(13) The prosecution will call witnesses to testify.

(14) The acquittal was a defeat for the prosecution.

(15) He was a key witness in the prosecution's case.

(16) The litigant was questioned by the prosecution.

(17) I am a witness for the prosecution in the trial.

(18) The nol pros motion was filed by the prosecution.

(19) The acquittal was a result of a weak prosecution.

(20) The indictment was a victory for the prosecution.

Prosecution make sentence

(21) The conviction was a triumph for the prosecution.

(22) The trial order was challenged by the prosecution.

(23) The mistrial was a blow to the prosecution's case.

(24) The adminicles were key to the prosecution's case.

(25) The new evidence bolstered the prosecution's case.

(26) The acquittal was a blow to the prosecution's case.

(27) The defendant's lie was exposed by the prosecution.

(28) The judge's ruling impugned the prosecution's case.

(29) The prosecution presented new evidence in the trial.

(30) I dispute the evidence presented by the prosecution.

Sentence of prosecution

(31) The judge is favouring the prosecution in this case.

(32) The prosecution was disappointed with the hung jury.

(33) The jury is out of sync with the prosecution's case.

(34) The lawyer is negativing the prosecution's evidence.

(35) The lack of evidence negated the prosecution's case.

(36) The prosecution team vowed to appeal the acquittals.

(37) The lawyer cross-examined the prosecution's witness.

(38) The defense attorney will argue against prosecution.

(39) The criminals fled the country to avoid prosecution.

(40) The prosecution was disappointed with the acquittal.

Prosecution meaningful sentence

(41) The lawyer was able to rebut the prosecution's case.

(42) Criminal prosecution is necessary to uphold the law.

(43) The prosecution sought a conviction in the new trial.

(44) The prosecution may use DNA evidence to prove guilty.

(45) The defendant will have to face prosecution in court.

(46) The defendant will have to answer to the prosecution.

(47) The suspect tried to act insane to avoid prosecution.

(48) The finding of fact was challenged by the prosecution.

(49) The lack of evidence nullified the prosecution's case.

(50) The prosecution has no grounds to dispute the verdict.

Prosecution sentence examples

(51) The judge ruled biassedly in favor of the prosecution.

(52) The lawyer will defend his client against prosecution.

(53) The prosecution presented their case during the trial.

(54) The killer's sentence was appealed by the prosecution.

(55) The defendant's lawyer is trying to avoid prosecution.

(56) The forger was offered a plea deal by the prosecution.

(57) The judge dismissed the case for criminal prosecution.

(58) The trial will be a test of the prosecution's evidence.

(59) The judge is favoring the prosecution in the courtroom.

(60) The prosecution has no grounds to dispute the sentence.

Sentence with prosecution

(61) The jury is out of sync with the prosecution's tactics.

(62) The acquittal was a disappointment for the prosecution.

(63) The evidence evinces a strong case for the prosecution.

(64) The judge granted the prosecution's request for remand.

(65) The criminal prosecution of the suspect was successful.

(66) The defendant's confession led to criminal prosecution.

(67) The jury is out of sync with the prosecution's argument.

(68) The prosecution will argue that the defendant is guilty.

(69) The defendant's alibi was questioned by the prosecution.

(70) The witness testified under duress from the prosecution.

Use prosecution in a sentence

(71) The lawyer's defense contradicts the prosecution's case.

(72) The witness lied to protect his friend from prosecution.

(73) The prosecution presented a video testimony as evidence.

(74) The dossier was a valuable resource for the prosecution.

(75) The juror believed the prosecution's evidence was strong.

(76) The compelling evidence supported the prosecution's case.

(77) The sentencing was seen as a victory for the prosecution.

(78) The jury's verdict seemed biased towards the prosecution.

(79) The expert witness was cross-examined by the prosecution.

(80) The prosecution was disappointed by the jury's acquittal.

Sentence using prosecution

(81) The prosecution tried to discredit the defendant's alibi.

(82) The lawyer's evidence disaffirmed the prosecution's case.

(83) The prosecution's averment was supported by DNA analysis.

(84) The new evidence was invalidating the prosecution's case.

(85) The uncollected evidence weakened the prosecution's case.

(86) The accusants were cooperative with the prosecution team.

(87) The defense attorney accused the prosecution of barretry.

(88) The prosecution may use expert testimony to prove guilty.

(89) Witness aside, the prosecution's evidence was compelling.

(90) The prosecution will make a closing argument to the jury.

Prosecution example sentence

(91) The lawyer argued that the prosecution's case was malign.

(92) The prosecution presented a strong case during the trial.

(93) The prosecution relied heavily on the victim's testimony.

(94) The evidence is overwhelming in favor of the prosecution.

(95) The convict's sentence was a victory for the prosecution.

(96) The accused pleaded guilty to avoid criminal prosecution.

(97) The indictment was seen as a victory for the prosecution.

(98) The prosecution failed to undermine the defendant's alibi.

(99) The case was overturned for misconduct by the prosecution.

(100) The prosecution's case relied heavily on aliunde evidence.

Sentence with word prosecution

(101) The lack of evidence delegitimized the prosecution's case.

(102) The lack of evidence could nullify the prosecution's case.

(103) The prosecution may use physical evidence to prove guilty.

(104) The witness's testimony was challenged by the prosecution.

(105) The dossier was a key component in the prosecution's case.

(106) The ruling was a reflection of the prosecution's strategy.

(107) The front in the courtroom was occupied by the prosecution.

(108) The suspect on trial was cross-examined by the prosecution.

(109) The contributory evidence supported the prosecution's case.

(110) The prosecution presented strong evidence during the trial.

Sentence of prosecution

(111) The prosecution intends to depose during the investigation.

(112) The jury towards the prosecution was attentive and engaged.

(113) The wight of the evidence supported the prosecution's case.

(114) The prosecution plans to file a motion to dismiss the case.

(115) The prosecution's case fell apart without aliunde evidence.

(116) The burden of proof will devolve down upon the prosecution.

(117) The new evidence completely trumped the prosecution's case.

(118) The deponent's lawyer argued for immunity from prosecution.

(119) The prosecution will cross-examine the defense's witnesses.

(120) The defense will cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses.

Prosecution used in a sentence

(121) The prosecution will offer a plea bargain to the defendant.

(122) The defendant will have to face prosecution for his crimes.

(123) The alleged defector fled the country to avoid prosecution.

(124) The witness's testimony contradicts the prosecution's case.

(125) The prosecution presented evidence to dispute the sentence.

(126) The defendant's lawyer argued against criminal prosecution.

(127) The subpoenas were a crucial part of the prosecution's case.

(128) The prosecution presented their evidence for a fair hearing.

(129) The prosecution presented their case to seek a fair hearing.

(130) The court chambered down against the prosecution's evidence.

Prosecution sentence in English

(131) The witness refused to assist the prosecution in their case.

(132) The judge's ruling was impacted in favor of the prosecution.

(133) The next witness was called to the stand by the prosecution.

(134) The celebrity used his wealth to escape cocaine prosecution.

(135) As a witness for the prosecution, I had to testify in court.

(136) The prosecution will seek the maximum penalty for the crime.

(137) The dissenting lawyer argued against the prosecution's case.

(138) The prosecution manipulated evidence unduly to win the case.

(139) The evidence presented in court led to criminal prosecution.

(140) The defense team cross-examined the prosecution's witnesses.

(141) The absents of a key witness weakened the prosecution's case.

(142) The prosecution is prepared to dispute the probation request.

(143) The concurrence of evidence supported the prosecution's case.

(144) The trial commenced with the prosecution's opening statement.

(145) The defendant's guilty plea was a relief for the prosecution.

(146) The judge's ruling was unduly biased towards the prosecution.

(147) The apathetic response from the jury shocked the prosecution.

(148) The glaring lack of evidence weakened the prosecution's case.

(149) The final judgment was seen as a triumph for the prosecution.

(150) The hung jury left the prosecution with a difficult decision.

(151) The prosecution was unable to disprove the defendant's alibi.

(152) The prosecution attempted to undermine the defendant's alibi.

(153) The defendant held out against the prosecution's accusations.

(154) The prosecution's averments were deemed credible by the jury.

(155) The jury's verdict was seen as a victory for the prosecution.

(156) The jury's verdict was seen as a triumph for the prosecution.

(157) The prosecution will file a motion to introduce new evidence.

(158) The prosecution will file a motion to admit expert testimony.

(159) In a court of law, the burden of proof is on the prosecution.

(160) The drug lord bribed officials to escape cocaine prosecution.

(161) The tribunician immunity protected tribunes from prosecution.

(162) The prosecution must prove guilty for each charge separately.

(163) The prosecution may use eyewitness testimony to prove guilty.

(164) The jury's decision was met with cheers from the prosecution.

(165) The prosecution will seek a harsh sentence for the defendant.

(166) The witness's testimony contradicts the prosecution's appeal.

(167) The prosecution presented a compelling case during the trial.

(168) The defendant's plea bargain was rejected by the prosecution.

(169) The prosecution relied heavily on the eyewitness's testimony.

(170) The defendant's testimony was discredited by the prosecution.

(171) The defendant's alibi was deemed spurious by the prosecution.

(172) The witness's testimony will bear out the prosecution's case.

(173) The judge ordered criminal prosecution against the defendant.

(174) The defense team negotiated a plea deal with the prosecution.

(175) The prosecution is confident about winning the trail by jury.

(176) The judge nullified the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(177) The defendant's lawyer will deny the claim of the prosecution.

(178) The omission of his testimony weakened the prosecution's case.

(179) The prosecution will present their witnesses during the trial.

(180) The prosecution challenges the defendant's claim of innocence.

(181) The prosecution is urging the jury not to dispute the verdict.

(182) The tribunal's decision was seen as a blow to the prosecution.

(183) The witness's affidavit was crucial to the prosecution's case.

(184) The corrupt official resorted to bribery to avoid prosecution.

(185) The law should uphold immunity from prosecution for diplomats.

(186) The prosecution's averment was supported by forensic evidence.

(187) The prosecution requested a rehearing to present new evidence.

(188) The prosecution plans to file a motion for a protective order.

(189) The recusals of the witnesses weakened the prosecution's case.

(190) The burden of proof will devolve through upon the prosecution.

(191) The witness will testify in support of the prosecution's case.

(192) He tried to escape cocaine prosecution by fleeing the country.

(193) The prosecution was satisfied with the empaneling of the jury.

(194) The prosecution team believes that the case is highly triable.

(195) Jury aside, the prosecution's closing argument was persuasive.

(196) The judge has given the prosecution until next week to indict.

(197) The burden of proof lies with the prosecution to prove guilty.

(198) The burden of proof lies with the prosecution in a court case.

(199) The defense attorney cross-examined the prosecution's witness.

(200) The delivery of the verdict was a victory for the prosecution.

(201) The prosecution is considering whether to dispute the verdict.

(202) The prosecution presented a strong case against the defendant.

(203) The defendant's lawyer tried to impugn the prosecution's case.

(204) The judge ordered the prosecution to rescind the plea bargain.

(205) The weight of evidence was skewed in favor of the prosecution.

(206) The defense team's job is to challenge the prosecution's case.

(207) The lawyer was able to defat the prosecution and win the case.

(208) The prosecution presented their case during the jury by trial.

(209) The prosecution presented a compelling legal brief to the jury.

(210) The interlocutory application was submitted by the prosecution.

(211) The lower court's ruling was seen as a blow to the prosecution.

(212) The nol pros outcome was seen as a setback for the prosecution.

(213) The standing body of evidence supported the prosecution's case.

(214) The judge approves the plea bargain offered by the prosecution.

(215) The process of criminal prosecution can be lengthy and complex.

(216) The prosecution argued that he was an accessory to the assault.

(217) The trial judge upheld the objection raised by the prosecution.

(218) The prosecution presented compelling evidence during the trial.

(219) The defense argued that the prosecution's evidence was aliunde.

(220) The jury's verdict showed a clear bias towards the prosecution.

(221) The defendant's alibi was deemed defeasible by the prosecution.

(222) The defendant will have to appear in court to face prosecution.

(223) The trial was a chance for the prosecution to prove their case.

(224) The prosecution presented a video as evidence during the trial.

(225) The witness's statement contradicts the prosecution's evidence.

(226) The witness's testimony contradicts the prosecution's rebuttal.

(227) The acquittal of the suspect was a setback for the prosecution.

(228) The lawyer spurned the plea bargain offered by the prosecution.

(229) The witness's testimony contradicts the prosecution's argument.

(230) The prosecution is confident that they can dispute the verdict.

(231) The defendant's acquittal was a blow to the prosecution's case.

(232) The indictment was a cause for celebration for the prosecution.

(233) The criminal prosecution was dropped due to a lack of evidence.

(234) The prosecution presented their case to the jury into the trial.

(235) The jury disaffirmed the prosecution's evidence as insufficient.

(236) The defendants' lawyer cross-examined the prosecution's witness.

(237) The prosecution called a key witness in this round of the trial.

(238) The prosecution sought maximum punishment for the triable crime.

(239) The lack of evidence calls into question the prosecution's case.

(240) The prosecution's averments were supported by forensic evidence.

(241) The prosecution's averment was based on circumstantial evidence.

(242) The defendant's denial of the charges surprised the prosecution.

(243) The prosecution will attempt to discredit the defendant's alibi.

(244) The assoilment of the suspect was a surprise to the prosecution.

(245) The prosecution insisted that the key witness testify in person.

(246) The lawyer was able to find disproofs of the prosecution's case.

(247) The adminicle was a valuable addition to the prosecution's case.

(248) The lawyer argued that the prosecution's case lacked factuality.

(249) The absence of the key witness nullified the prosecution's case.

(250) The prosecution may use circumstantial evidence to prove guilty.

(251) The prosecution was able to poke holes in the defendant's alibi.

(252) The lawyer's defense was impugned by the prosecution's evidence.

(253) The prosecution presented a strong case to dispute the sentence.

(254) The prosecution was able to find holes in the defendant's alibi.

(255) The prosecution's case relied heavily on the victim's testimony.

(256) The prosecution's evidence is being used to dispute the verdict.

(257) The deserter fled to a neighboring country to avoid prosecution.

(258) The prosecutor recommended criminal prosecution for the accused.

(259) The attorney filed a motion to dismiss the criminal prosecution.

(260) The prosecution presented hearsay evidence from multiple sources.

(261) The burden of proof rests on the prosecution in a criminal trial.

(262) The nol pros ruling was seen as a blow to the prosecution's case.

(263) The defendant's phone records were subpoenaed by the prosecution.

(264) The burden of proof lies with the prosecution in a criminal case.

(265) The hung jury left the prosecution with a challenging task ahead.

(266) The prosecution argued that the defendant's alibi was fabricated.

(267) The prosecution argued that the defendant's alibi was unreliable.

(268) The judge quickly dismissed objections raised by the prosecution.

(269) The prosecution's averment was supported by surveillance footage.

(270) The prosecution will file a motion to introduce expert testimony.

(271) The prosecution's case fell apart due to allegations of barretry.

(272) The lawyer is reputing the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(273) The expert testimony was corroborative of the prosecution's case.

(274) The lawyer controverts the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(275) The witness downgraded the credibility of the prosecution's case.

(276) The lawyer was able to successfully rebut the prosecution's case.

(277) The witness's statement was deemed unreliable by the prosecution.

(278) The fugitive absconded to a foreign country to avoid prosecution.

(279) The criminal absconded to a foreign country to avoid prosecution.

(280) The prosecution's case relied heavily on the witness's testimony.

(281) The prosecution presented evidence to support the remand request.

(282) The prosecution attempted to poke holes in the defendant's alibi.

(283) The prosecution struggled to offer substantiation for their case.

(284) The prosecution presented evidence of a kickback scheme in court.

(285) The prosecution presented a strong case during the jury by trial.

(286) The expert witness's testimony was challenged by the prosecution.

(287) The prosecution presented compelling arguments for a fair hearing.

(288) The prosecution will allege that the defendant planned the murder.

(289) The witness's selective amnesia undermined the prosecution's case.

(290) The witness for the prosecution identified the defendant in court.

(291) The prosecution presented a compelling case against the defendant.

(292) The prosecution presented compelling evidence during the hearings.

(293) The grand jury reviewed the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(294) The defense attorney accused the prosecution's witness of perjury.

(295) The prosecution is confident that no one will dispute the verdict.

(296) Criminal prosecution serves as a deterrent to potential offenders.

(297) Criminal prosecution seeks to ensure justice for victims of crime.

(298) Criminal prosecution is a vital tool in maintaining public safety.

(299) The burden of proof lies with the prosecution in a criminal trial.

(300) The lawyer's harangue exposed the flaws in the prosecution's case.

(301) The burden of proof is borne by the prosecution in a court of law.

(302) The lawyer presented evidence to discredit the prosecution's case.

(303) The arraigned defendant's alibi was questioned by the prosecution.

(304) The judge urged the prosecution to prosecute towards a fair trial.

(305) The witness testimony univocally supported the prosecution's case.

(306) The judge acceded to the prosecution's objection and sustained it.

(307) The judge okays the plea deal between the prosecution and defense.

(308) The prosecution's averments were based on circumstantial evidence.

(309) The lawyer rebuts the prosecution's argument with strong evidence.

(310) The lawyer's refutal of the prosecution's argument was convincing.

(311) The prosecution will call upon the eyewitness to testify in court.

(312) The jury's acquittals of all charges shocked the prosecution team.

(313) The defendant's untruths were easily disproven by the prosecution.

(314) The prosecution may use confessions or admissions to prove guilty.

(315) Jury aside, the prosecution had a strong case against the accused.

(316) The defendant's alibi was called into question by the prosecution.

(317) The prosecution was disappointed when the defendant was acquitted.

(318) The prosecution presented a strong case with multiple testimonies.

(319) The defendant's lawyer tried to impugn the prosecution's evidence.

(320) The prosecution's evidence was circumstantial and easy to dispute.

(321) The prosecution presented their case to the jury over several days.

(322) The trial will be a battle between the defense and the prosecution.

(323) The lower court's ruling was seen as a victory for the prosecution.

(324) The prosecution will dispute the evidence presented by the defense.

(325) The lawyer was able to successfully rebut the prosecution's claims.

(326) The nol pros ruling was met with disappointment by the prosecution.

(327) The hearings were a chance for the prosecution to prove their case.

(328) The defendant's claim of innocence is dismissed by the prosecution.

(329) The jury's doubts were enough to tear apart the prosecution's case.

(330) The defendant's allocution was met with anger from the prosecution.

(331) The prosecution is confident that no one will dispute the sentence.

(332) The burden of proof will fall upon the prosecution in a court case.

(333) The lawyer presented an audacious argument against the prosecution.

(334) The prosecution presented strong evidence to prevail with evidence.

(335) The jury was convinced and the prosecution prevailed with evidence.

(336) The prosecution's plea to quash by the lack of venue was dismissed.

(337) The prosecution's plea to quash to the lack of venue was dismissed.

(338) The prosecution's request to quash by the insanity plea was denied.

(339) The prosecution's request to quash to the insanity plea was denied.

(340) The defendant's claim was rebuttable by the prosecution's evidence.

(341) The lawyer tried to nullify off against the prosecution's evidence.

(342) The government must uphold immunity from prosecution for diplomats.

(343) The jury was swayed by the persuasive pleaders for the prosecution.

(344) The prosecution was able to indict through the use of DNA evidence.

(345) The defense attorney tried to indict beside the prosecution's case.

(346) The trial will be a chance for the prosecution to prove their case.

(347) The jury's decision was met with satisfaction from the prosecution.

(348) The prosecution is confident that the verdict will not be disputed.

(349) The witness's testimony was used to support the prosecution's case.

(350) The evidence presented in court contradicts the prosecution's case.

(351) The witness's statement was used to support the prosecution's case.

(352) The defendant's lawyer argued that the prosecution had a weak case.

(353) The judge's sentence was considered too lenient by the prosecution.

(354) The indictment was a clear sign of the prosecution's determination.

(355) The lawyer's defense was discredited by the prosecution's evidence.

(356) The prosecution's case was strong and hard to dispute the evidence.

(357) The defense team objected to the prosecution's line of questioning.

(358) Individuals who engage in insider trading are liable to prosecution.

(359) The killers' trial showcased the dedication of the prosecution team.

(360) The defense attorney accused the prosecution's witness of perjuring.

(361) The jury disaffirmed the prosecution's case due to lack of evidence.

(362) The physical evidence was the cornerstone of the prosecution's case.

(363) The prosecution called expert witnesses to testify during the trial.

(364) The prosecution presented evidence to prove the defendant's perjury.

(365) The prosecution is urging the jury not to dispute the final verdict.

(366) The alibi presented by the defense was dismissed by the prosecution.

(367) The lawyer strategically alluded against the prosecution's evidence.

(368) The lawyer argued against the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(369) The judge gave the nod to the prosecution to present their evidence.

(370) The lawyer filed a motion to dismiss the warrant by the prosecution.

(371) The trial's outcome was a victorious conclusion for the prosecution.

(372) Venires are evaluated by both the prosecution and defense attorneys.

(373) The witness's testimony gave authenticity to the prosecution's case.

(374) The prosecution challenged the credibility of the character witness.

(375) The defense attorney allegered that the prosecution's case was weak.

(376) The lawyer prepared a compelling rebutter to the prosecution's case.

(377) The prosecution's case was weakened by the lack of aliunde evidence.

(378) The prosecution's case was bolstered by the use of aliunde evidence.

(379) Mistrials can be caused by misconduct by the prosecution or defense.

(380) The judge will not allow the prosecution to indict without evidence.

(381) The defendant was acquitted because the prosecution's case was weak.

(382) The defense attorney will cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses.

(383) The chain of evidence in the trial was presented by the prosecution.

(384) The indictment was a chance for the prosecution to prove their case.

(385) The lawyer was able to outmaneuver the prosecution and win the case.

(386) The jury is up and evaluating the strength of the prosecution's case.

(387) The prosecution will aver that the defendant's alibi is not credible.

(388) The prosecution presented their case during the pretrial proceedings.

(389) The appellate court's decision was seen as a blow to the prosecution.

(390) The depositions were used to build a strong case for the prosecution.

(391) The defendant's due process rights were respected by the prosecution.

(392) The witness's testimony added plausibility to the prosecution's case.

(393) The lawyer's argument aimed to invalidate the prosecution's evidence.

(394) The jury was through with their evaluation of the prosecution's case.

(395) The prosecution presented a strong averment of the defendant's guilt.

(396) The defense attorney challenged the averment made by the prosecution.

(397) The jury responded unfavorably to the prosecution's lack of evidence.

(398) The defense attorney attempted to nullify the prosecution's evidence.

(399) The prosecution's case was built on a foundation of aliunde evidence.

(400) Concededly, the evidence presented by the prosecution was compelling.

(401) Inferentially, the witness testimony supports the prosecution's case.

(402) The expert depones that the evidence supports the prosecution's case.

(403) The prosecution failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

(404) The prosecution was unable to indict through due to lack of evidence.

(405) The lawyer tried to refute the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(406) The prosecution will drop some charges in exchange for a guilty plea.

(407) The indictment was a source of satisfaction for the prosecution team.

(408) The witness's testimony was used to undermine the prosecution's case.

(409) The prosecution called several witnesses to testify during the trial.

(410) The delivery of the verdict was a disappointment for the prosecution.

(411) The witness's testimony was used to discredit the prosecution's case.

(412) The forensic evidence was used to corroborate the prosecution's case.

(413) The incumbent judge is respected by both the prosecution and defense.

(414) The prosecution's evidence was so strong that it was hard to dispute.

(415) The prosecution argued that the defendant's alibi was too convenient.

(416) The lawyer presented a strong rebuttal to the prosecution's argument.

(417) The defendant's alibi was weak, so the prosecution had a strong case.

(418) The suspect was apprehended and given a plea deal by the prosecution.

(419) The defendant's lawyer accused the prosecution of trumping up charges.

(420) The criminal suit was delayed due to a change in the prosecution team.

(421) The prosecution presented new evidence during the pretrial conference.

(422) The prosecution requested a continuance after the pretrial conference.

(423) The captor's confession provided crucial evidence for the prosecution.

(424) The prosecution presented multiple witnesses to provide oral evidence.

(425) The mistrial was a result of the judge's bias towards the prosecution.

(426) The accused has the right to a fair trial during criminal prosecution.

(427) The complex legal case perplexed both the prosecution and the defense.

(428) The prosecution presented evidence to challenge the defendant's alibi.

(429) The prosecution called the witness to depose during the investigation.

(430) The prosecution will decry the charge as a necessary step for justice.

(431) The prosecution presented a strong case, and I agree with the verdict.

(432) The defendant's abjuration of his plea deal surprised the prosecution.

(433) The jury towards the prosecution's case was unconvinced and skeptical.

(434) The trial judge granted the prosecution's motion to suppress evidence.

(435) The abettal of the suspect was a key factor in the prosecution's case.

(436) The sovereign immunity of the diplomat protected him from prosecution.

(437) The defendant's lawyer will object against the prosecution's evidence.

(438) Diplomats are granted immunities from prosecution in the host country.

(439) The burden of proof will fall among the prosecution in the court case.

(440) The witness against the accused was the key to the prosecution's case.

(441) The burden of proof lies with the prosecution to indict with evidence.

(442) The defendant's appeal aside, the prosecution presented a strong case.

(443) The police officer was a key witness for the prosecution in the trial.

(444) The defense may argue that the prosecution has failed to prove guilty.

(445) The prosecution will appeal if they believe the verdict was incorrect.

(446) The prosecution's case was weak, leading to the defendant's acquittal.

(447) The defendant's acquittal was a result of the prosecution's weak case.

(448) The prosecution presented a strong testimony from a character witness.

(449) The prosecution failed to prove their case, resulting in an acquittal.

(450) The prosecution's case was weakened by the acquittal of a key witness.

(451) The prosecution's expert witness is being used to dispute the verdict.

(452) The prosecution rested its case after all the witnesses had testified.

(453) The lawyer countered the prosecution's argument with a strong defense.

(454) The lawyer countered the prosecution's evidence with a strong defense.

(455) The prosecutor was praised for his successful prosecution of the case.

(456) The case analysis demonstrated the flaws in the prosecution's argument.

(457) The prosecution relied heavily on hearsay evidence to build their case.

(458) The criminal court granted the prosecution's request for a continuance.

(459) The prosecution presented compelling evidence of racketeering in court.

(460) The witness's prevarication in court undermined the prosecution's case.

(461) The judge acceded to the prosecution's request for additional evidence.

(462) The dissenting opinion highlighted the flaws in the prosecution's case.

(463) The lawyer countered the prosecution's argument with a compelling case.

(464) The accused has the right to remain silent during criminal prosecution.

(465) The witness's story contradicts the facts presented by the prosecution.

(466) The defendant's untruths were dismantled by the prosecution's evidence.

(467) The witness's alibi was too strong to be overlooked by the prosecution.

(468) The jury was through with their evaluation of the prosecution's motive.

(469) The prosecution presented a compelling case in this round of the trial.

(470) Those who engage in fraud will suffer the penalty of legal prosecution.

(471) The prosecution's counterpleading objection was overruled by the judge.

(472) The recusation of the judge was met with skepticism by the prosecution.

(473) The prosecution will argue that the defendant's alibi is a fabrication.

(474) The perjuring defendant's credibility was shattered by the prosecution.

(475) The prosecution accused the defense of trying to distort the testimony.

(476) The defendant will have to hire a lawyer to defend against prosecution.

(477) The acquittal was a result of the prosecution's failure to prove guilt.

(478) The witness's statement contradicts the prosecution's closing argument.

(479) The prosecution was able to prove that the defendant's alibi was false.

(480) The indictment was a clear sign that the prosecution had a strong case.

(481) The defendant was ordered to hand over all evidence to the prosecution.

(482) The prosecution is concerned that the defense will dispute the verdict.

(483) The evidence presented in court contradicts the prosecution's argument.

(484) In court, the prosecution and defense have an adversarial relationship.

(485) The lawyer's argument was convolute against the prosecution's evidence.

(486) The defendant's alibi was proven to be irrebuttable by the prosecution.

(487) The prosecution was able to indict through the use of expert testimony.

(488) The prosecution must have a strong case with evidence before indicting.

(489) In exchange for his testimony, the prosecution offered him a plea deal.

(490) The defendant is fighting against his extradition to avoid prosecution.

(491) The prosecution presented a witness list during the pretrial conference.

(492) The jury is up and evaluating the credibility of the prosecution's case.

(493) The witness's decision to dummy up frustrated the prosecution's efforts.

(494) The court denied an appeal by the prosecution to introduce new evidence.

(495) The witness took the stand to dispute the claim made by the prosecution.

(496) The prosecution relied heavily on the oral evidence to build their case.

(497) The jury was convinced by the formal proof presented by the prosecution.

(498) The prosecution is confident that no one will dispute the final verdict.

(499) The prosecution called several witnesses to testify against the accused.

(500) The lack of motive presented reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case.

(501) The prosecution failed to provide enough evidence to acquit the suspect.

(502) The prosecution and defense attorneys worked together to empanel a jury.

(503) The judge must be unbiased towards both the prosecution and the defense.

(504) The prosecution's case fell apart, leading to the defendant's acquittal.

(505) The prosecution's averments were consistent with the timeline of events.

(506) The trial judge granted the prosecution's request for a change of venue.

(507) The remanding of the suspect was met with applause from the prosecution.

(508) In a surprising turn of events, the court rules against the prosecution.

(509) The witness testimony had veracity in supporting the prosecution's case.

(510) The prosecution presented a compelling testimony from an expert witness.

(511) The prosecution argued that there was no reason to dispute the sentence.

(512) The witness's statement contradicts the prosecution's version of events.

(513) The prosecution's evidence was based on hearsay and was easy to dispute.

(514) The prosecution presented their case, but the jury remained unconvinced.

(515) The appealability of the verdict is being questioned by the prosecution.

(516) The defense attorney tried to discredit the prosecution's motive theory.

(517) The lawyer retorted with strong evidence against the prosecution's case.

(518) The sudden loss of the key witness threw the prosecution into confusion.

(519) The prosecution requested to impanel a larger jury for the complex case.

(520) The prosecution was able to indict through the use of a sting operation.

(521) The defense team's strategy was to discredit the prosecution's evidence.

(522) The defendant's lawyer impugned the prosecution's case during the trial.

(523) The jury overestimated the credibility of the prosecution's key witness.

(524) The witness for the defense was able to refute the prosecution's claims.

(525) The judge allowed the prosecution to cross-examine the character witness.

(526) The character witness's testimony shed doubt on the prosecution's claims.

(527) The lawyer argued against the untenability of the prosecution's evidence.

(528) The defendant's alibi was dismissed as a technicality by the prosecution.

(529) The judge's impartiality was praised by both the prosecution and defense.

(530) The witness's account contradicts the statements made by the prosecution.

(531) The defense attorney argued that the prosecution had fabricated evidence.

(532) The unaccounted absence of key witnesses weakened the prosecution's case.

(533) The prosecution presented a compellable witness to strengthen their case.

(534) The prosecution presented a video recording as evidence during the trial.

(535) The prosecution was able to quash by the defense's motion for a mistrial.

(536) The prosecution was able to quash to the defense's motion for a mistrial.

(537) The lawyer tried to invalidate the evidence presented by the prosecution.

(538) The government is working to improve the prosecution of mail fraud cases.

(539) The prosecution relied on the expert's testimony to explain the evidence.

(540) The lawyer presented a strong dispute against the prosecution's evidence.

(541) The prosecution believes there is enough evidence to dispute the verdict.

(542) The defendant's plea of innocence was deemed spurious by the prosecution.

(543) The insurance fraud prosecution team is cracking down on insurance fraud.

(544) The prosecution presented a strong case for remand, and the judge agreed.

(545) The ruling was based on a technicality, which frustrated the prosecution.

(546) The blackhanders have been known to bribe officials to avoid prosecution.

(547) The assoilment of the plaintiff was a disappointment for the prosecution.

(548) The prosecution was disappointed when the defendant was found not guilty.

(549) The judge ordered the prosecution to clear up the loophole in their case.

(550) The prosecution pleaders presented strong evidence against the defendant.

The word usage examples above have been gathered from various sources to reflect current and historical usage of the word Prosecution. They do not represent the opinions of TranslateEN.com.